We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please help me. Unfair train fine !!!
Comments
-
The penalty is a civil debt but failing to provide correct details is a criminal offence
As already stated by both myself and Optimist.
"The above civil matter becomes a criminal matter if you fail to supply the correct address to a "authorised person"
&
Who would arrest them? and for what? Giving false details is an offence, but failing to speak English isn't."theres no smoke without fire
It seems that your knowledge of the law is seriously lacking, as your comments about ticket inspectors being able to access the police database, DVLA records, and other protected information clearly shows0 -
FYI The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 1994 was amended in 2005.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
FYI The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 1994 was amended in 2005.
Correct.
It was amended, not cancelled.
The actual legislation was the "The Railways (Penalty Fares) (Amendment) Regulations 2005"
And the only reason for the amendment was to change the amount payable for penalty fares that was originally stated in the 1994 act. (up from £10 to £20)
It made no changes to when or where penalty tickets could be issued, nor did it make any changes to the failure of paying penalty charges being a civil offence.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/1095/made0 -
I'd never heard of the train company mentioned by the OP before reading this thread. (I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of train operating companies, however.)0
-
MothballsWallet wrote: »I'd never heard of the train company mentioned by the OP before reading this thread. (I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of train operating companies, however.)
One of the many new ones under the mess that is our rail system."The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell. British author, mathematician, & philosopher (1872 - 1970)0 -
Perhaps Mr Blair could start his own rail firm - call it "Rip Off & Spin Rail"?
We used to have Central Trains round here - they lost the franchise, now it's London Midland.0 -
Yep. Google here
We're still waiting to hear back from the OP if they have found anything in the way of evidence that can show that the OP's gf cannot have been on the train.
That would clear things up pretty quickly.
If not, the debate here so far is going to leave them with plenty to think about.
Should they just take it to a solicitor?Hi, I'm a Board Guide on the Old Style and the Consumer Rights boards which means I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly and can move and merge posts there. Board guides are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. It is not part of my role to deal with reportable posts. Any views are mine and are not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.DTFAC: Y.T.D = £5.20 Apr £0.50
0 -
again the travelling without a ticket is only an offence of the conditions of carriage, If the person is unable to provide a name and address then that is a criminal offence and the person could be detained by the inspector or british transport police. Not being able to speak english does not exclude you from the law. A BTP officer will be asked to attend if no details are given.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
When revenue issue a penalty the have to confirm the identity of the person in question. They do this via databases. The person would of had to give without hesitation their full name date of birth and full address with post code(not easy to make up on the spot). This would then be checked and verified. So assuming these standard check were made then the person in question is either
a)you
b)your girlfriend
c)a close family member
the chances of it being a complete stranger are 4% at best.
The final possibility is that the whole thing is bogus, when you call to question the letter do you find the number yourself or use the one atop of the letter? It is probably more likely that its a scam and just pishing for every 1000 letters they send out 1% pay without hesitation.
Good luck
Actually i got fined once as my sister had "borrowed" my purse and hadnt returned it so i couldnt pay. tHEY just wrote my name, adress and postcode, no computer. Gave me a slip and i was off.0 -
Thanks for all the help everyone.
Just to remake a point in my original post, my girlfriend was not on the train and therefore they cannot in any possible way, prove that she was.
which is why i suggested for the TO to provide proof eg they got her address from the person who gave your gf's details so surely they could match teh handwriting0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards