We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Please help me. Unfair train fine !!!

13567

Comments

  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    mttylad wrote: »
    Just write back to them, tell them it was not her and that until they can prove otherwise you will enter into no further correspondence on the matter.

    The not entering further correspondence is bad advice. Part 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules requires the parties to cooperate and to take steps to avoid litigation.
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    withabix wrote: »
    ...except of course in a Criminal court, the standard of evidence required is also different.

    GC would be required to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it was the OP's girlfriend on the train.

    They won't be able to do that, unless they took a photograph and have witnesses (who aren't their employees).
    If it is the magistrates', then the standard of proof is 'on the balance of probability'
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    The not entering further correspondence is bad advice. Part 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules requires the parties to cooperate and to take steps to avoid litigation.
    Hmm. This is not helped by the fact that it can go down the civil or the criminal track . What would be awful is to assume it is civil and end up in the criminal track after having dealt with it as a civil matter.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • withabix
    withabix Posts: 9,508 Forumite
    If it is the magistrates', then the standard of proof is 'on the balance of probability'

    No, that's only for civil law cases.

    Criminal law cases are ALL 'beyond reasonable doubt', whichever court they are heard in.


    If this got to court (civil or criminal), it would be thrown out, because Grand Central can't possibly have any evidence.
    British Ex-pat in British Columbia!
  • sirmarcus
    sirmarcus Posts: 1,381 Forumite
    Can't beat a nice & healthy debate ? Shame that Untd won !;)
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not sure if its the same for train operators but i know if you dont pay a taxi fare, its a "civil" matter and not criminal.

    Even if the train attendant did ask for ID, not everyone carries this with them and AFAIK, train attendants arent one of the people you HAVE to show ID to by law.

    I'd agree it isnt a "fine". Its an invoice. Similar to a "penalty charge notice" that people receive whem parking in supermarket car parks that are privately owned.

    Write to them asking for proof it was your girlfriend. If they cannot provide this, ask them to ask the train attendant for a description (i may just be being hopeful but surely they dont give out THAT many "fines" do they? and it may help your girlfriend recognise who has given her details).
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • Money_User
    Money_User Posts: 286 Forumite
    sirmarcus wrote: »
    Can't beat a nice & healthy debate ? Shame that Untd won !;)

    Which CEO should the op email Sirmarcus?
  • Zandoni
    Zandoni Posts: 3,465 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I remember now, she was at your house with many other members of the family.

    Now all she needs to do is write to them and give them the names of the people she was with.
  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    Hmm. This is not helped by the fact that it can go down the civil or the criminal track . What would be awful is to assume it is civil and end up in the criminal track after having dealt with it as a civil matter.

    If it is criminal, then there must be a caution given.

    I think this is civil.
  • Even if the train attendant did ask for ID, not everyone carries this with them and AFAIK, train attendants arent one of the people you HAVE to show ID to by law.

    Correct, which is why if the attendant thinks that you are showing false id or a fake ticket/travel pass, they can ask for id and if you refuse to show it, all they can do is to call ahead and try to get a policeman to meet them at the next station.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.