We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ESA Medical - here we go again!
Comments
-
Yes it is.
No it isnt.
Yes it is.
No it isnt.
Yes it is.
No it isnt.
Yes it is.
No it isnt.
Well, he needs to be quick, because I have to get some grub in about 10 minutes. Besides which, I was getting bored with him after his second or third response.
I've only kept it going because I try to respond to all posts addressed to me - it's just common courtesy to do so.0 -
It also doesn't give you the right to assume that there's 'nothing much wrong with you'.
And tribunals get to see and inspect all that medical evidence that the DWP/Atos go out of their way to ignore.
So, as far as an informed decision about a person's medical status goes, it's rather obvious whose word is going to carry more weight.
'Far more generous' as in 'Far more fair'? Is that what you meant?
I'd say it was more the other way around.
Looks like I have touched a nerve - I did say maybe but you were ignorant of that.
The DWP read all the evidence too.
No far more generous.
You clearly know very little about the subject, that is easy to see.0 -
I don't drive :eek:
Something that has always terrified me. But thanks Melbury. :beer:
It's not so bad. Everyone gets nervous at first - you get used to it.
I never thought I'd ever pass my test first time, but I did (I got stuck behind a hearse on my test day!).
17 years later, no accidents of any kind (not even a minor 'prang').
The tip is - driving's easy. It's keeping a watch on everyone else that's the hard bit.
Then again, with the way petrol's been going up, you'd need to take out a second mortgage just to get filled up.0 -
Looks like I have touched a nerve - I did say maybe but you were ignorant of that.
Well, the 'maybe' can be ruled out.The DWP read all the evidence too.
Not if it doesn't get sent to them. Even if it were, maybe the DWP ignore it, or are too stupid to understand it.No far more generous.
'Generous' in what way?You clearly know very little about the subject, that is easy to see.
And what subject would that be?0 -
Well, the 'maybe' can be ruled out.
Not if it doesn't get sent to them. Even if it were, maybe the DWP ignore it, or are too stupid to understand it
'Generous' in what way?
And what subject would that be?
In your opinion.
That would be the claimants fault if it was not sent to them. I do not see why they would ignore it and I do not think the DWP would employ people who are too "stupid". There are Civil Servants who help on here so it is ignorant to call them stupid.
In the usual meaning of the word.
You really are not keeping up.0 -
Thread closed!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards