We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rental property a total disgrace

123457

Comments

  • I think forces life is so close knit, you know your neighbours and there's a respect that goes along with that.


    Yep, and if your neighbour is a lower rank then other, official sanctions can often be brought to bear. My dear old Dad was an RSM in the Military Police so a "friendly" word often worked wonders. Having a six-foot tall German Mum with little tolerance for unneighbourliness often had the same affect. Oh, happy days!
  • Well I was going to do what you all suggested when I got home. I thought I better go check the garden anyway due to high winds during the day yesterday. Surely enough the fence has now fallen down, so I had to go speak to them anyway.

    They are very pleasant - both them and the neighbours next to them, as well as myself have all had our fences fall down (damn wind), so we are each going to sort the ones we are responsible for (luckily for them, they all rent so it will be down the landlord to pay).

    I didnt mention the rubbish, I didnt need to as we had someone round to quote for the fences last night and they said to them about it all, they said that now the fences are down the rubbish could end up in everyone elses garden - he said to the fence fitter guy that he would be removing it shortly. So fingers crossed he does.

    Thank you everyone who gave me advice on this post. Apologies to anyone I offended with my comments. :A

    Thanks again.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    It's good to talk!

    Great outcome.
  • moggylover
    moggylover Posts: 13,324 Forumite
    HappyMJ wrote: »
    The fence is not the tenants responsibility. It hasn't fallen down and if it did it's the landlords problem.

    After reading this thread I feel like I must be the worst neighbour. My garden is overgrown. I've got dead whitegoods (washing machine and old fridge) out the back. A pile of carpet rotting away. No wooden fence on one side. It's my responsibility. It fell down it was removed and now a plastic temporary fence is there and has been for 9 years.


    Can I ask? Why would you leave it like that? I'm not trying to be rude I'm just genuinely interested as to why you would not be bothered about clearing the rubbish away at least?

    I have a neighbour here who has a garden that is that kind of mess, and worse (a rotted old caravan, and bits and bobs of old cars and tyres, etc.)! I really hate to burst everyones bubble: but they are owner/occupiers.
    "there are some persons in this World who, unable to give better proof of being wise, take a strange delight in showing what they think they have sagaciously read in mankind by uncharitable suspicions of them"
    (Herman Melville)
  • moggylover wrote: »
    they are owner/occupiers.

    Aha thats what OO stands for to which everyone was referring to. Thank you:j
  • moggylover
    moggylover Posts: 13,324 Forumite
    I do agree with you and we must say that I tend to generalise rather than stereotype and it must be accepted that not all people in a particular group conforms to the particular generalisation.

    I also agree that if you cant pay your mortgage then you need to downsize,sell or rent and that the state should not underwrite the continuance of your lifestyle above and beyond what would be afforded to a renter/benefits claimant..but we are digressing.

    We are all one big happy family now under New Labours system of "Fairness" and renters and the unemployed can now live in executive homes just so that they dont feel marginalised.



    *shakes head sadly in despair at the bigotry*:(
    "there are some persons in this World who, unable to give better proof of being wise, take a strange delight in showing what they think they have sagaciously read in mankind by uncharitable suspicions of them"
    (Herman Melville)
  • moggylover
    moggylover Posts: 13,324 Forumite
    Aha thats what OO stands for to which everyone was referring to. Thank you:j


    My pleasure:) I have, in the past, been known to spend ages trying to work out what some of the acronyms are: but that one is one of the ones I do get.:)
    "there are some persons in this World who, unable to give better proof of being wise, take a strange delight in showing what they think they have sagaciously read in mankind by uncharitable suspicions of them"
    (Herman Melville)
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    moggylover wrote: »
    *shakes head sadly in despair at the bigotry*:(

    Do you think that people living entirely on benefits should be living in million pound plus houses?
  • ILW wrote: »
    Do you think that people living entirely on benefits should be living in million pound plus houses?

    Now now! Leave the Royal family out of it....
  • ILW wrote: »
    Do you think that people living entirely on benefits should be living in million pound plus houses?

    No, but...the post says:
    renters ...can now live in executive homes just so that they dont feel marginalised.

    Yes...renters can live where they like...all they have to do is pay the rent. High quality housing isn't limited to those who want to take out a mortgage.

    I've lived in some lovely houses, which I've rented. And I've enjoyed the benefit of not having to shell out when the boiler goes wrong, or the windows need replacing.

    Don't make the mistake of thinking that tenants are poor, or in some way lesser citizens than those who live in a house owned by the bank...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.