We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Graham White Solicitors pursuing with County Court Claim
Comments
-
Yawn, well bored now.
I'm intrigued why someone who is an ex colleague of someone else takes it so personally that they take to the forums to defend that person when they are "attacked". And throws around all sorts of accusations with apparently no basis in fact. I have many ex-colleagues but I could not imagine doing that at all or if I did with the barely repressed passion of murdo.
But I won't try to dwell on it as it will no doubt encourage more of the same.0 -
murdomaguire wrote: »This thread was hijacked at post #10 and did not get back to anything other than abuse until I posted some proper advice at #45.
My point is that Lucy led the advice on this issue re the Excel cases thus members of this website beating her up on the basis of bogus parking advice (which she has never given) is both perverse and unjust.
Why are you suggesting that posts #10 to #44 are little more than abuse? Could you please highlight the abuse contained in each of those posts.
You have made a lot of unfounded accusations regarding members of this site. Unless you have evidence to back them up it then I cannot see any benefit in you continuing to repeat them.
Some people could be led to conclude that you are doing no more than trolling.0 -
Are you now suggesting that LucyBC didn't come here and state this to state her credentials and credibility (before spamming her website/self promotion etc)?:
What I take out of this is that there are some people (the vast majority) who take offence at the (bogus) claim that she has suggested paying private parking companies £10 -- when this is clearly not the case.
And there are some people who seem to have a basic problem with her very existence.
You seem to fall into the latter category Quentin. I'm not quite clear why this would be.
You seem to work in the insurance sector.
So do I.
Have you had some detrimental dealings with her firm regarding a claim or something? I know they are tough but I am surprised at it being so personal.0 -
Looking more like a troll with each post now.0
-
Why are you suggesting that posts #10 to #44 are little more than abuse? Could you please highlight the abuse contained in each of those posts.
Read them and report back. It basically became an a**e-kicking competition by proxy with NeverAgain the target purely for speaking up for her.
I return to my query as to why anyone would go to such lengths to misrepresent her views? - as we seemingly all now accept that they were misrepresented.0 -
We are all advised not to feed trolls, so you will be able to have the last word(s).
You don't make any attempt to answer the points raised about your trouble making posts, but come up with more trouble making.
I have had no dealings with her apart from on here. I have no connection with anyone or any firm that has had dealings with her.
Having now read your posting history it's obvious we should all reach for the ignore button.0 -
murdomaguire wrote: »Read them and report back. It basically became an a**e-kicking competition by proxy with NeverAgain the target purely for speaking up for her.
I return to my query as to why anyone would go to such lengths to misrepresent her views? - as we seemingly all now accept that they were misrepresented.
I did.
There is no way that all the posts are abuse, if you think so then report them.
You have confirmed that you are no more than a troll.
Not sure what your agenda is sad that you feel the need to resort to trolling.0 -
I am new around here and my original mention of LBC in post eight was entirely innocent.
What has followed has been nothing short of disgraceful in what is supposed to be a civilised and open forum.
There are a small number of keyboard warriors on here who think their views must prevail.
Any dissent is shouted down in a concerted effort which is certainly designed to intimidate, and could be seen as bullying.
Several times i have been ordered to be respectful of 'long term posters' who deserve - and will get from me - only derision.
That this lamentable state of affairs has been allowed to develop must be partly the fault of MSE management, or lack of it.
But I have a prediction for the self-styled big hitters on here.
One day, someone upstairs will realise you are harming the brand.
When that day comes, your glorious posting careers on MSE will end faster than you can type the word 'troll'.0 -
Now an attempted pincer movement from two trolls. Do not feed them and hopefully they will go back unedr the bridge.0
-
NeverAgain wrote: »
my original mention of LBC in post eight was entirely innocent.
No one said it was not, it was just pointed out that LBC's advice is not particularly well thought of on these forums, it was you that made a big thing of it.
What has followed has been nothing short of disgraceful in what is supposed to be a civilised and open forum.
Why because people happened to disagree with you, people are allowed their opinions that is what an open forum is all about.
There are a small number of keyboard warriors on here who think their views must prevail
So anyone that disagrees with your views are either 'forum jackals' or 'keyboard warriors'.
Any dissent is shouted down in a concerted effort which is certainly designed to intimidate, and could be seen as bullying.
It would seem that it is only you and your mate murdo that have that opinion around here
Several times i have been ordered to be respectful of 'long term posters' who deserve - and will get from me - only derision.
Just where has anyone ordered you to be respectful, all that was said is that several long term posters are respected for their input into these forums.
That this lamentable state of affairs has been allowed to develop must be partly the fault of MSE management, or lack of it.
What a load of tosh if that was the case it would have been jumped on ages ago by the MSE team
But I have a prediction for the self-styled big hitters on here.
Predict away if it helps your ego.
One day, someone upstairs will realise you are harming the brand.
In your opinion.
When that day comes, your glorious posting careers on MSE will end faster than you can type the word 'troll'.
Maybe yours will come and sooner judging by your refusal to even listen to other posters.
As it was my post #10 and my other posts in this thread that has appear to cause such controversy I have not posted further in this thread, however after reading the full thread again it does appear to be two posters that are trying to disrupt the forum by accusing people of being abusive when in actual fact they were trying to help the OP by not giving advice that may not help them resolve their problem.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards