We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MOT requirement for Insurance to be valid

1246

Comments

  • dacouch
    dacouch Posts: 21,636 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    vaio wrote: »
    Nah, the only way they can not cover is if the car is unroadworthy AND that unroadworthyness caused or contributed to the accident

    I struggle to see how a number plate could fall into that category

    I suppose they were working along the rightish lines eg the outside possibility of number plate making the car unroadworthy.

    The mind boggles at what accident could directly be caused / significantly caused by a delaminated number plate. However if you see the type of amazing coincidences that happen in some accidents you can never say never.
  • B00st
    B00st Posts: 78 Forumite
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    another money making scam by the dvla,:mad:

    In what way is the requirement for a taxed vehicle to have insurance a scam to make money for the DVLA? Other than the 5% insurance tax, the money goes to the insurance companies themselves.

    Not surprisingly this requirement was actually lobbied for by the insurance companies and then made impending law.
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    B00st wrote: »
    In what way is the requirement for a taxed vehicle to have insurance a scam to make money for the DVLA? Other than the 5% insurance tax, the money goes to the insurance companies themselves.

    Not surprisingly this requirement was actually lobbied for by the insurance companies and then made impending law.

    if you buy a new car and change your insurance over then you have to sorn your old car and return the tax for a refund, part months are non refundable so you would lose out, then if you sold the car, the new owner has to retax it and pay for a full month even if its only half way through.
    i cant see any reason for this new insurance sorn as any cars that arent insured will be picked up by the anpr system anyway.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    if you buy a new car and change your insurance over then you have to sorn your old car and return the tax for a refund.......

    Since when?

    Ignore this.
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    edited 13 January 2011 at 3:36PM
    Quentin wrote: »
    Since when?

    Ignore this.[/QUOTE

    why??
    this is coming in soon

    Stay insured: new penalties for vehicles without motor insurance

    dg_4000938.jpg
    From early 2011 a new scheme is being introduced to make sure that all vehicles stay insured or a Statutory Off Road Notification (SORN) is made. The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) are working together to reduce the number of uninsured drivers.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    When is it coming in that you have to send your road tax in for a refund when you buy a new car and change your insurance company?
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    what i m saying is if your car is off the road and not insured then you will have to return your tax disc to the dvla. (if i bought a new car and kept the old one on my drive while i tried to sell it and the insurance was transferred to my new vehicle then i would have to return my tax)
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    edited 13 January 2011 at 4:00PM
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    (if i bought a new car and kept the old one on my drive while i tried to sell it and the insurance was transferred to my new vehicle then i would have to return my tax)

    Why? And what's it got to do with this thread? (Your contribution to the MOT issue this thread is about needs to be ignored too)
  • Inactive
    Inactive Posts: 14,509 Forumite
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    what i m saying is if your car is off the road and not insured then you will have to return your tax disc to the dvla. (if i bought a new car and kept the old one on my drive while i tried to sell it and the insurance was transferred to my new vehicle then i would have to return my tax)

    Who told you that ?
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Inactive wrote: »
    Who told you that ?


    From the direct.gov.uk website


    What to do as a vehicle keeper

    If you are not insured and use your vehicle on the road you are already committing an offence – get insured immediately.
    If you are keeping your vehicle off the road, make sure that you have submitted a SORN declaration to DVLA. If the vehicle is taxed you need to return the disc (including nil value discs) to DVLA using a V14 form. You can make a SORN declaration at the same time as returning the disc on the V14.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.