We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Got a 4x4? Would you like to put it to good use and confound the green 'antis'?
Comments
-
As an example - our off road driving trainer is BORDA (British Off Road Driving Association) trained.
Bearing in mind that we are almost 4 years old, we are in the process of gaining accreditation for our Training Courses.
We are all amateurs, but we do what we do in a professional manner.0 -
So who trained the trainers?
It all sounds a bit amateurish to me, even if well intentioned.
Actually then you get a chicken and egg scenario that could be applied to anything. Who trained the college lecturer? but then who trained his lecturer and so on.
For the record here's one of the trainers my local 4x4 response group uses: http://www.woodpark-offroad.com/ and we all PAY for the training. It doesn't come free.
So please, amateurish it isn't, a willingness to help out in a professional manner where required is what it is.Near a tree by a river, there's a hole in the ground.
Where an old man of Aran goes around and around....0 -
So who trained the trainers?
It all sounds a bit amateurish to me, even if well intentioned.
Maybe you should offer your services Inactive?
Lots of volunteer services are amateurish in the nicest possible way - doesn't make them ineffective.
Many "unsung" services would struggle in this country without the army of volunteers that give their time0 -
sunshinetours wrote: »Maybe you should offer your services Inactive?
Lots of volunteer services are amateurish in the nicest possible way - doesn't make them ineffective.
Many "unsung" services would struggle in this country without the army of volunteers that give their time
I didn't mean it in an offensive way, I said " well intentioned ".
Maybe you should offer yours, you have winter tyres, I don't.0 -
I didn't mean it in an offensive way, I said " well intentioned ".
Maybe you should offer yours, you have winter tyres, I don't.
I assumed considering your large number of posts on such subjects you had a field of expertise in the area so my comment was also "well intentioned" at you
I already volunteer for other things in my spare time and probably insurance issues with my car being company owned would prevent it anyway. Would happily take neighbours family friends etc if they were struggling though as I am sure you would
Anyway I thought winter tyres were a waste of money?
Happy New Year (genuinely meant I would add!)0 -
sunshinetours wrote: »
Happy New Year (genuinely meant I would add!)
Likewise, a Happy New Year to you.:)0 -
Contraversial no doubt, but does anyone who has passed the standard driving test, and has to prove they can drive in a suitable manner for the conditions at hand, need snow training?????.
If they are of suitable quality to "own" a licence, surely they are capable of learning to "adapt".
Or is this another example of over mollycoddling?, Seriously, :wall::wall::wall:I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.
Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)
Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed0 -
cyclonebri1 wrote: »Contraversial no doubt, but does anyone who has passed the standard driving test, and has to prove they can drive in a suitable manner for the conditions at hand, need snow training?????.
If they are of suitable quality to "own" a licence, surely they are capable of learning to "adapt".
In theory they should be able to adapt, alas the reality is quite different, as we have all witnessed in this cold snap.
The standard driving test does not, nor ever could cover these conditions, it is just a very basic test.0 -
cyclonebri1 wrote: »Contraversial no doubt, but does anyone who has passed the standard driving test, and has to prove they can drive in a suitable manner for the conditions at hand, need snow training?????.
If they are of suitable quality to "own" a licence, surely they are capable of learning to "adapt".
Or is this another example of over mollycoddling?, Seriously, :wall::wall::wall:
We provide extra driving training for two main reasons;
1. to ensure that the Responder we send out to carry out a task is capable of carrying out said task and also has a degree of awareness of his (and his vehicle's) limitations.
2. To ensure that the Responder doesn't end up needing rescue himself.
As time goes on and the Group gains in experience, I'm sure further training needs will be identified and we'll work very hard to address them.0 -
Harry_Flashman wrote: »We provide extra driving training for two main reasons;
1. to ensure that the Responder we send out to carry out a task is capable of carrying out said task and also has a degree of awareness of his (and his vehicle's) limitations.
2. To ensure that the Responder doesn't end up needing rescue himself.
As time goes on and the Group gains in experience, I'm sure further training needs will be identified and we'll work very hard to address them.
No females within your group then ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards