Nice people thread part 3- Nice as pie

lemonjelly

lostinrates wrote: »

LJ, you are such a dear chap...women must be queuing up to snuggle up to you.

Failing that, you are welcome to carry my bag for me sometime.

I assume I look better on an internet forum...;)

chewmylegoff

michaels wrote: »

I suspect LIR might have her own seat if they hadn't got rid of the heredities.

It would be ace if she was in parliament. Imagine the expenses claims:

1 house (giant) for duck island --- £100,000 etc etc

lostinrates

lemonjelly wrote: »

I assume I look better on an internet forum...;)

Really? Or modest? Or good it be time to accept you might need new clothes? I'm sure you look perfectly adaquate. To be honest, you are so sweet you don't need to look too great....personality really does count.

PasturesNew

Doozergirl wrote: »

Officially too much time on my hands.

guess what this is:

jghsshjgjhgsshjg

Your cat typing.

Doozergirl

lemonjelly wrote: »

What are the essentials that people take with them on a 2/3/4 day break? Aside from toiletries, change of underwear, phone & charger, camera & charger, book & wallet, do I really need much else for a city break where I'm not exactly going to do much other than chill, wander about and stuff?

(have a feeling I've forgotten some really obvious stuff & am going to end up all when I read this thread in the morning...)

At least three handbags, two pairs of heels, two pairs of Uggs, a pair of trainers and a pair of ballet flats. Passport. 3 interiors magazines, 2 books and a newspaper, large bottle of water, as many restaurant vouchers from MSE as possible. 6 outfits to cover all weathers and occasions. Nice jumper, hoody and a coat (just in case) and all the shopping I've picked up before I've hit the hotel because I'm concerned I haven't brought enough. And nail varnish. Lots of it that I never get the time to put ona t home because I'm on here. And never get the chance to put on over there either, just take it home again.

Is that the right answer?

lostinrates

chewmylegoff wrote: »

It would be ace if she was in parliament. Imagine the expenses claims:

1 house (giant) for duck island --- £100,000 etc etc

I really miss mewbie. I'm sure he would have got that earlier.

lemonjelly

lostinrates wrote: »

yes, it was very well done in all respects, I agree. (but for me every film is better at home than in cinema). Some bits felt uncomfortable in there familiarity, which is the mark of a good film, but also an uncomfortable one. I did have to put my hands over my eyes at some points.

Perhaps I like his films so much because of those uncomfortable moments? It tells me something of what we're like as people. I dunno.

If you had to look away at parts of Black Swan, I'm not sure that Requiem for a Dream would be your cup of tea, even though it is a powerhouse of a movie.

My favourite film ever is Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Tom Stoppard directs Tim Roth, Gary Oldman, and Richard Dreyfuss.

I know which way the wind is blowing...:)

lemonjelly

PasturesNew wrote: »

Your cat typing.

Proper lol! I've read some crackers on one or 2 forums this evening...

Night all!:wave:

PasturesNew

lostinrates wrote: »

True conversation with local farmer this week when he met my father:

oh, I thought she were really posh before I met you, because she always in the garden in a right state of appearance.

Is that polite speak for NAKED WITH A CHICKEN?

lemonjelly

PN is on fire...