Warning - apcoa - must see

Driver8

Stigy wrote: »

If a person admits to being the driver of the vehicle when it was parked under questioning and whilst under caution, that would be all that's needed.

Under questioning? Under caution? Who the hell do you think you are? You are a PCSO wannabe, you get a yellow jacket with them not a vest oooh and a cheap looking cap.

Going to get this post deleted too loser?

Driver8

Stigy wrote: »

As an official who is trained to an acceptable level, I can caution and question when I believe an offence may have been committed. There's no impersonation of a Police Officer involved, and it's under the same authority that an RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector) has.

You literally are the epitome of a PPC car park attendant, got to your station in life then.

Getting this one deleted too?

real1314

Stigy wrote: »

As an official who is trained to an acceptable level, I can caution and question when I believe an offence may have been committed. There's no impersonation of a Police Officer involved, and it's under the same authority that an RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector) has.

What caution do you use?
How do you record the interview?
How do you offer the "suspect" a copy of the interview record?

geordie_taxi

Stigy wrote: »

As an official who is trained to an acceptable level

please tell us what level your trained too and who says its acceptable

Stigy wrote: »

it's under the same authority that an RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector) has.

so you have same authority of a Revenue Protection Inspector but your not a Revenue Protection Inspector

please tell us what ur job title is

anewman

Stigy wrote: »

As an official who is trained to an acceptable level, I can caution and question when I believe an offence may have been committed. There's no impersonation of a Police Officer involved, and it's under the same authority that an RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector) has.

I tell you to eff off and take a hike and go about my own business. What can you do then?! You have no powers of arrest.

Stigy

real1314 wrote: »

What caution do you use?
How do you record the interview?
How do you offer the "suspect" a copy of the interview record?

Caution = You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention, when questioned, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.

Also, the "now" caution can be used, mainly for issuing a PND (when effectively charging for an offence); You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence, if you do not mention now, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence

The interview is recorded in my Pocket Note Book (PNB)

The suspect is offered no copy of the record as there isn't one available, although they are given the opportunity to read any sign the notes I have made as a true and accurate account, which they are not obliged to do. This doesn't make the interview or MG11 void.

geordie_taxi wrote: »

please tell us what level your trained too and who says its acceptable



so you have same authority of a Revenue Protection Inspector but your not a Revenue Protection Inspector

please tell us what ur job title is

I'm an Accredited Person, although not employed by a Police Authority. I have the same powers as any other railway official to report offences, but am trained to an equivalent level as an RPI would be. My training was carried out by an outside company, and they decide if you are competant.

anewman wrote: »

I tell you to eff off and take a hike and go about my own business. What can you do then?! You have no powers of arrest.

You're more than free to leave, but people like this tend to stick around as they want their say. Eff Off is only the start of it, and they rarely actually walk off. Although routinely true what you are saying, you might want to check out parts of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889...namely 5.3(c).

Driver8

Stigy wrote: »

Caution = You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention, when questioned, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.

Also, the "now" caution can be used, mainly for issuing a PND; You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence, if you do not mention now, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence

The interview is recorded in my Pocket Note Book (PNB)

The suspect is offered no copy of the record as there isn't one available, although they are given the opportunity to read any sign the notes I have made as a true and accurate account, which they are not obliged to do. This doesn't make the interview or MG11 void.

I'm an Accredited Person, although not employed by a Police Authority. I have the same powers as any other railway official to report offences, but am trained to an equivalent level as an RPI would be. My training was carried out by an outside company, and they decide if you are competant.


You're more than free to leave, but people like this tend to stick around as they want their say. Eff Off is only the start of it, and they rtarely actually walk off.

You sad sad person, you are not a cop.

sassy_one

Stigy wrote: »

As an official who is trained to an acceptable level, I can caution and question when I believe an offence may have been committed. There's no impersonation of a Police Officer involved, and it's under the same authority that an RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector) has.

You really do talk some real utter rubbish, Stigy!

You have no authority and even by doing so, it would not stand in a court of law within the United Kingdom - I have studied law and I know what I am stating and this statement I'm about to make is 100% correct: You are wrong.

You really think that you can come here and make all these false claims and people will be stupid enough to roll over and believe it?!....
Did you not read my thread yesterday?! I got a silly little 'invoice' that one of your 'invoice mob' issued me, I ripped it up - that's what I think of your silly invoices you write out daily to extort money from least expecting and unaware people.

I will not be silent, I will campaign till everyone knows the current legal status of the 'invoices' that you enjoy issuing!

The fact that you can't handle the fact the 'invoices' you issue on a daily basis mean nothing, is something you need to learn the law on I suppose.


If I parked in a car park of all those 100's you work in and was either clamped or reported for a bylaw offence, I'd fight you all the way in court, and in mean time, remove the clamp :T and please, don't think I won't, I carry a 36v battery operated drill just for that very reason in my boot

Do you think I'm going to allow you to intimidate me in order to extort money from unenforceable invoices?.... No.

Will I allow you to extort money from others?.... No, I make as many people aware of your scam as possible!


ANd finally, regards post reporting, I have this evening reported a number of your posts for not only ill formed information stated as facts, by you by also claiming you would impersonate of a Police officer or use Caution, when you have no power to do so, and in doing so, you commit a criminal offence.

You need to understand and learn, your 'invoices' that you issue, are worthless.

atrixblue.-MFR-.

cannot caution and cannot detain! if you tired cautioning me in a carpark id laught at you and then call the police to report you for impersonation of a police officer, i would then walk away from you, if you tried to detain me in any way i would have you arrested for common assualt.

clamp operators have to have a licence in order to clamp a vehicle not just the company, they cannot block you in as this breaks their own parking rules. they have to show your they are licenced. you can check they are licenced by calling the number on their licence cant remember what company it is that you check with. if their not you can demand that the clamp is taken off right away and call police.

sassy_one

Stigy wrote: »

Caution = You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention, when questioned, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.

Also, the "now" caution can be used, mainly for issuing a PND (when effectively charging for an offence); You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence, if you do not mention now, something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence

The interview is recorded in my Pocket Note Book (PNB)

The suspect is offered no copy of the record as there isn't one available, although they are given the opportunity to read any sign the notes I have made as a true and accurate account, which they are not obliged to do. This doesn't make the interview or MG11 void.

I'm an Accredited Person, although not employed by a Police Authority. I have the same powers as any other railway official to report offences, but am trained to an equivalent level as an RPI would be. My training was carried out by an outside company, and they decide if you are competant.


You're more than free to leave, but people like this tend to stick around as they want their say. Eff Off is only the start of it, and they rarely actually walk off. Although routinely true what you are saying, you might want to check out parts of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889...namely 5.3(c).

By doing that you are liable for civil and possible criminal proceedings under the DPA - Data Protection Act, depending how the information you have falsely obtained on a illegal level.


Again, even if you did this, it would not stand in a court of law within the United Kingdom, at a 0% level.

Your efforts to try and cause disruption on these forums have been reported to site admin