We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

JJB gave grandsons ipod away.

1568101147

Comments

  • Itunes stores this information. You do not need the ipod plugged in to retrieve it.

    I think it is very unlikely the ipod will ever be retrieved, its quite possible that the ipod will have been sold on by now. However, if the woman can be identified by the CCTV/credit or debit card then this would not be neccessary as the CCTV and JJB staff witness statements would surely be sufficient evidence.
  • Itunes stores this information. You do not need the ipod plugged in to retrieve it.

    But how does this prove that the Ipod the woman took is the 11 year olds if you can't get the IPOD
    The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!

    If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!

    4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!
  • adouglasmhor
    adouglasmhor Posts: 15,554 Forumite
    Photogenic
    Physio88 wrote: »
    I realise that they can post what they like and fairly so have the right to do this; on this we are agreed. Its just a shame that they feel the need to when it bears no relevance or usefulness other than trying to impose their absurd views on the readers.

    Even adults lose things from time to time. Can you honestly say you have never lost anything? Bearing this in mind, should you not be allowed to own anything in case you lose it?

    This does not excuse the fact that the ipod was lost temporarily, found, and then stolen.

    I agree it was stolen, which is shocking. The JJB staffers were naïve rather than negligent I think. The fact I sometimes lose things is a good reason I do not take them to places where I am likely to be distracted with other things and be trying on clothing etc. and lose them. Maybe that is just me though.
    The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett


    http.thisisnotalink.cöm
  • I don't see why there is such argument over such a simple legal issue.

    JJB have done nothing wrong legally. They might have been silly in not checking the identity of the person claiming the iPod, but they're a shop not a lost property office and there's no legal requirement for them to act as custodians for lost property handed in to what might be quite casual weekend staff. Often there is no policy on these things: nor should there be, surely? The cashier's job is to serve customers and they should be expected to use common sense in handling someone passing a lost item to them.

    As such, nothing you can do about JJB I'm afraid.

    As for the lady who took the iPod, that is theft, pure and simple. She satisfies the mens rea for the crime by dishonesty: she appropriated the property belonging to your grandson with the intention to permanently deprive; and would surely have done this deliberately rather than accidentally as I assume the device has different content and songs on it to the one that she lost.

    As such, she is a thief and the police should pursue her.

    Will they? Well...unlikely. And as much as you might want them too, reasonably you can't expect them to investigate every case of an iPod getting stolen: they would be inundated!

    So, I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but I think you'll need to take this one of the chin and hope that the police find out the identify of the mystery woman.

    I don't see how this would be anything but an open and shut case for the police. As the OP says there is CCTV of the incident and the woman paid by credit/debit card. Surely, just using this evidence they could quickly find the woman and use the evidence they have to press for a return or a reimbursement with the threat of criminal proceedings.
  • pulliptears
    pulliptears Posts: 14,583 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Physio88 wrote: »
    I think it is very unlikely the ipod will ever be retrieved, its quite possible that the ipod will have been sold on by now. However, if the woman can be identified by the CCTV/credit or debit card then this would not be neccessary as the CCTV and JJB staff witness statements would surely be sufficient evidence.

    Possibly so, but worthwhile getting hold of the serial in case she is ever caught with the goods on her person.
  • pulliptears
    pulliptears Posts: 14,583 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    But how does this prove that the Ipod the woman took is the 11 year olds if you can't get the IPOD

    If the woman is identified and questioned and happens to have an ipod in her handbag with the same serial number I think that about proves it don't you?
  • adouglasmhor
    adouglasmhor Posts: 15,554 Forumite
    Photogenic
    But how does this prove that the Ipod the woman took is the 11 year olds if you can't get the IPOD

    Receipt, packaging, log on record at iTunes. It's up to the police to recover stolen goods though. You can only give them the info.
    The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett


    http.thisisnotalink.cöm
  • Physio88 wrote: »
    I think the primary route the OP should take should be in a police investigation into the woman who stole the ipod, not JJB who were just irresponsible and careless in giving the theif the item. However, if JJB are unwilling to help and are intentionally getting in the way and preventing justice being served then there could well be a case against them.

    They are unwilling until the police are involved and quite rightly so, I would not tell a customer the details of another customer or use them to track them down until required as this puts you in dodgy land regards data protection etc
    The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!

    If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!

    4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!
  • cyberbob
    cyberbob Posts: 9,480 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I've not read all the Bickering on this thread so apologies if this has been mentioned but does the OPs House Insurance cover items like this? It's worth checking.
  • I agree it was stolen, which is shocking. The JJB staffers were naïve rather than negligent I think. The fact I sometimes lose things is a good reason I do not take them to places where I am likely to be distracted with other things and be trying on clothing etc. and lose them. Maybe that is just me though.

    I don't think it is just you, but equally there are a lot of people who do either by neccessity or choice carry expensive items with them. My girlfriend takes her ipod with her everywhere, however, she has the right to do this without being judged if she was to lose it. :beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.