We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
footballnomics
Comments
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Unlike Manchester United..... Arsenal are financially healthy despite the debt.2009 - Operating profits (before depreciation and player trading) in the football business were £62.7 million (2008 - £59.6 million).
The thing is, if you're paying millions for players on 3-5 year contracts then player depreciation is huge!
For example, Koscielny signed a 4 year contract and Arsenal paid a transfer fee of £8,500,000. His value on the balance sheet will decline at a rate of £2,125,000 per year.
The fact is that Arsenal, Liverpool and Man Utd all rely on Champions League football in order to prosper. Take it off them for a couple of seasons and I fear for their solvency. Chelsea of course are a special case as their owner appears prepared to cover any losses incurred by Chelsea.
If you could afford a wage bill of £100,000,000 on Premier League income, the likes of Tottenham, Aston Villa and Newcastle would be doing so and as a result would be able to compete regularly with those that can afford those salaries.
If one of the big 4 is kicked out of regular CL football then they will be in financial trouble before too long.0 -
-
The thing is, if you're paying millions for players on 3-5 year contracts then player depreciation is huge!
For example, Koscielny signed a 4 year contract and Arsenal paid a transfer fee of £8,500,000. His value on the balance sheet will decline at a rate of £2,125,000 per year.
The fact is that Arsenal, Liverpool and Man Utd all rely on Champions League football in order to prosper. Take it off them for a couple of seasons and I fear for their solvency. Chelsea of course are a special case as their owner appears prepared to cover any losses incurred by Chelsea.
If you could afford a wage bill of £100,000,000 on Premier League income, the likes of Tottenham, Aston Villa and Newcastle would be doing so and as a result would be able to compete regularly with those that can afford those salaries.
If one of the big 4 is kicked out of regular CL football then they will be in financial trouble before too long.
Don't disagree. Though Arsenal are as much a property company as a football club. Also the Emirates is a major conference centre. So does generate non match day income.
The days of big player money transfers are over except for clubs like Man City. Look at this years free transfers i.e. Cole, James, Ballack, Gallas. Clubs are offloading their wage bill.
Loan transfers. Bellamy is getting £20k a week at Cardiff. Man City are paying the other £60k or so of his wage.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Not so far for supporters to travel to watch them......
I think those fans will happily take up the seats not bought by the home supporters, which will be plenty enough'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Heard that tickets for the Newcastle home game weren't oversubscribed. Available right up to the day of the game. So no ones immune in the current climate.
True, single tickets are available for almost every game, then again the ground does hold 76,000'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
There's always been a separation between the haves and the have nots in the Premiership. But I'm just wondering if this year is the year that a chasm really starts to open up. Chelsea have scored 12 in two games. Arsenal destroyed Blackpool, Wigan have been destroyed twice already (and once by Blackpool!)
I'm concerned that we could have a situation where the top 4/5 teams disappear well into the distance before Christmas0 -
There's always been a separation between the haves and the have nots in the Premiership. But I'm just wondering if this year is the year that a chasm really starts to open up. Chelsea have scored 12 in two games. Arsenal destroyed Blackpool, Wigan have been destroyed twice already (and once by Blackpool!)
I'm concerned that we could have a situation where the top 4/5 teams disappear well into the distance before Christmas
Not so sure. Newcastle scored 6 past Villa - a promoted team doing well against, what many would assume to be a team vying for europe.
I actually think in the longer term we could see a situation where there is a distinction between well run/managed clubs, and badly run ones.
To be honest, we all know there are Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Spurs, Villa, Man City & possibly Everton chasing the top 7 places. Everyone else is vying to avoid the bottom 3.It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Only 14,476 turned up to watch the Wigan match today. Is TV slowly strangling the game now?
No, Wigan's fanbase sucks. They got about 5000 for an FA cup game against Hull last season.
Part of being a football team in Rugby League land and being close to Manchester, I suppose. They'll be getting relegated this season anyway it appears.0 -
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/tickets/season-tickets
Hear is a thread on it. dated last year.
http://forums.liverpoolfc.tv/showthread.php?t=131328
Just going on what people are saying about how long they have been opn the list.
Yea I had a quick look at their website and saw that actually, fair play to them. Obviously the 45k isn't big enough for Englands most successful club, but I did notice there were plenty empty seats knocking about in their stands near the end of last season0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards