is that al megrahi still alive? nearly a year after his release - another lefty

IveSeenTheLight

nicko33 wrote: »

taken from news-of-the-wold.com

"For the 2 virgins, footballer Mr A and innocent Miss B it was lust at first sight. But after one night they never met again. Nine months later Miss B gave birth to a baby boy"

That implies something, but doesn't say it directly.

Got a link for that, or more to the point and on topic, can you show a link in reference to the discussion where it implies that Raoul Moat was released early

IveSeenTheLight

nearlynew wrote: »

Are you sure it doesn't infer something?

Why don't you pop over to this link and discuss your 100% gaurantee

adouglasmhor

StevieJ wrote: »

Yes I know, what are you smoking

I haven't smoked since having a cigar on New Years day at the bells for 2006. Stop your silly little attempts at humour (I hope it's humour and not spite).

StevieJ

StevieJ wrote: »

I suppose we have to be thankful we don't live in West Memphis where three guys are locked up on the flimsiest of evidence (for a heinous crime I may add). The DNA profiling that our police seem to be mopping up old crimes with was enacted here and no defendants DNA was found, but some known DNA was found but did not result in a retrial. Ironically the only new person that ended up in the dock was Natalie from the Dixie Chicks who was sued for defamation, fortunately she was cleared, but the judge of the original trial insisted he was the one to decide if a re-trial was necessary and guess what he decided? :eek:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20002775-504083.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6227677n&!!!!!contentMain;contentBody

http://www.wm3.org/

My faith in US justice has been raised a notch (that is not saying much) it appears that the courts will now allow a new hearing for this case. One of the problems compounding the conviction of the innocent is that you allow the guilty to go free.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- The three men convicted in the grisly murders of three West Memphis Cub Scouts won new hearings Thursday to argue their innocence, more than 15 years after they were sent to prison despite scant physical evidence linking them to the crime scene.

The Supreme Court rebuked Circuit Court Judge David Burnett for not holding a hearing on the DNA evidence before rejecting Echols' request for a new trial in 2008. Burnett had ruled that the crime-scene DNA evidence - which shows no trace of Echols or the two other men convicted of the murders - was legally inconclusive and not enough to prove innocence

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/04/AR2010110402532.html

http://opinions.aoc.arkansas.gov/WebLink8/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=50532