We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Possibility of a council house? No idea how to start.

1234689

Comments

  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    How the OP and her family spend their money is of no concern. Should the OP and her sister choose to live independantly, the harsh realities of the real world will visit upon them soon enough.

    It is relevant when the OP posts about how hard up her mother is and it turns out that this is because there are 3 adults in the household not paying their way!
  • I live in the same area as the OP....and yes, some of the places are in rougher areas.... but equally some of them are actually really nice! ...Same as everywhere really.

    Don't scare her!

    Not all council places are 'rough'!


    Shhhhhhh! Or they'll ALL want one!
  • iamana1ias
    iamana1ias Posts: 3,777 Forumite
    Actually, if you read the OP, she is on Incapacity and DLA. This is not 'sponging off the state'

    I honestly hope you never know the misery of being disabled.

    Yeah, no-one fiddles the benefits system ;)

    Not saying the OP is, but the overall picture in that household is a joke.
    I was born too late, into a world that doesn't care
    Oh I wish I was a punk rocker with flowers in my hair
  • JC9297
    JC9297 Posts: 817 Forumite
    Just wondering why the OP feels she needs to move out, surely only her sister, boyfriend and the baby need to move to solve the overcrowding problem. If the OP wants to leave home to be independent then why not apply for a flat on her own rather than with her sister?
  • JC9297 wrote: »
    Just wondering why the OP feels she needs to move out, surely only her sister, boyfriend and the baby need to move to solve the overcrowding problem. If the OP wants to leave home to be independent then why not apply for a flat on her own rather than with her sister?

    Isn't that a decision for her and her sister to make?
  • iamana1ias wrote: »
    Yeah, no-one fiddles the benefits system ;)

    Not saying the OP is, but the overall picture in that household is a joke.

    And, of course, no-one ever fiddles their tax, or expenses, or mileage, etc etc etc?
  • sulkisu
    sulkisu Posts: 1,285 Forumite
    edited 14 June 2010 at 8:10PM
    I have to say that my sister and I don't I guess, give my mum much money, so it is my dad and mum who shoulder most of the bills. It is more about whether my sister, boyfriend, baby could get a council place and if possible I go share with them?

    Disgraceful. The money that you and your sister receive is supposed to pay for your living costs. The vast majority of it should be going to your parents - to pay for food, utilities, board etc. By your own admission, your parents are struggling financially, which makes your behaviour even more shameful.
    As for sister's boyfriend, he and his girlfriend have created a child and he may need to put his college dreams on hold in the short-term while he takes responsibility for supporting the family that he has created. Or if need be, he should ask his parents for help - why should your parent's support him?

    Regarding the question of housing, LA are more likely to consider an application from your sister and her boyfriend, but doesn't include you. Your sister and her boyfreind will be eligible for a two-bedroomed property (as they have a child), but with you included on the application they would then need a three-bedroomed property. Larger properties are in much shorter supply.
  • iamana1ias
    iamana1ias Posts: 3,777 Forumite
    And, of course, no-one ever fiddles their tax, or expenses, or mileage, etc etc etc?

    I doubt most do to the tune of £100s a week! And for the majority that wouldn't hit the taxpayer!

    Honestly, I wonder why my parents bothered working full time and paying for the children they had. I should just have got knocked up at 15 and they needn't have bothered! :mad:
    I was born too late, into a world that doesn't care
    Oh I wish I was a punk rocker with flowers in my hair
  • iamana1ias wrote: »
    I doubt most do to the tune of £100s a week! And for the majority that wouldn't hit the taxpayer!

    Honestly, I wonder why my parents bothered working full time and paying for the children they had. I should just have got knocked up at 15 and they needn't have bothered! :mad:

    That choice was always open to you. However, I don't think MOST benefit claimants are fiddling !100's a week out of the system. In much the same way that MOST taxpayers aren't on the fiddle.
  • iamana1ias
    iamana1ias Posts: 3,777 Forumite
    That choice was always open to you. However, I don't think MOST benefit claimants are fiddling !100's a week out of the system. In much the same way that MOST taxpayers aren't on the fiddle.

    The benefits board on this site would imply otherwise!
    I was born too late, into a world that doesn't care
    Oh I wish I was a punk rocker with flowers in my hair
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.