Warning girls pamper parties Little Divaz uk

shellsuit

marleyboy wrote: »

As this is a business address, posting the address is perfectly acceptable, no different to saying Natwest Bank PLC, 233 Kings Road, London SW1.

I have no qualms about posting a companies address, its how a business works, they have a base, with which to do business from and to.

Lucky, I could have posted much more, from the phone number to their photographs.

Who lives at Natwest Bank PLC 233 Kings Road, London SW1???

trumpton

Best thread ever.

jacktyler

marleyboy wrote: »

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: :T

marleyboy

shellsuit wrote: »

Who lives at Natwest Bank PLC 233 Kings Road, London SW1???

Dunno Giz a clue

shellsuit

marleyboy wrote: »

Dunno Giz a clue

I'm asking you.

You posted Katies personal home address, just because it happens to be her business address, tried to justify it by saying, "Look, I can post this address too" and then posted a NatWest address.

But nobody lives in the NatWest building do they?

Someone lives in Katies house ~ Katie and? BF? Child? Elderly relative?

I don't understand why you posted it anyway, if people want it, it isn't hard to find, but there's no need to highlight it here.

jacktyler

to bring this back on topic, (and i know i said i was bored with little divaz!)

but take a look at this - this really takes the biscuit! :eek:

there are 2 glowing reviews of Little Divaz on google maps.

the first is by a user called city.

City Limos just happens to be the company Little Divaz contracts for limos.
(there is a link to their site from katie's pink limo parties website.

the second review, unbelievably, is actually from Katie herself!!!! she's actually [STRIKE]used[/STRIKE] abused the reviewing system to advertise more services!

it gets better - if you point at the user city's name, you can see they have posted 2 reviews altogether in google maps. you can click this link to read the other review.

it takes you through to city limo's google maps page and there is a review of city limos, by city!! :rotfl:

there is also a review from Little Divaz UK - username........ ping81 !!!! :rotfl:

is this a stitch-up or what? :eek:

jacktyler

i would advise everyone to click the flag as inappropriate link, next to katie's "review" and report it to google.

it is clearly not a review, but a blatant abuse of the system.

Kayteehee

I've been reading this thread with huge interest.

I'm also called Katie and i'm 21....please don't shoot me!... and i'm building up photography business as well as studying it at uni. There is no way that I would take on jobs that i'm not capable of for fear of letting people down. Just don't take all the bookings. I've been doing photography for six years now and I only just did a wedding this year on my own (after assisting at four last year),despite being asked to do weddings for the past 3 years... a wedding is something so important that everything has to go well, there can be no car problems, ill staff or whatever, because the wedding party have to have their images.

You need to be 100% capable before you start booking people's 'special days', which yes to a young child their birthday is THEIR special day............ if you can't stand the heat Katie Brown then get out of the kitchen...ie. if you can't cope with so many bookings, DON'T TAKE THEM!

There is no way that my age should be an excuse for letting people down, and i'm having to constantly prove my reliability, maturity and capability to people because of my young age, and because of people like Little Divaz Katie Brown.

Well done to everyone's detective work on here.

jacktyler

if you report it, feel free to copy and paste the text below, which i have sent to google:

This "review" is not a review at all. It is a clear violation of your comment posting policy, specifically:

"Don't use comments as a forum for advertisement."

Please can you remove this at the earliest opportunity.

JoeyGrey

Jacktyler - I pray that if I ever decide to take up a life of crime, you are nowhere near at the time, or in fact at any time!