Warning girls pamper parties Little Divaz uk

jacktyler

Kayteehee wrote: »

There is no way that my age should be an excuse for letting people down, and i'm having to constantly prove my reliability, maturity and capability to people because of my young age, and because of people like Little Divaz Katie Brown.

what a contrast in character to katie brown's earlier post. :T

all the best and i wish you great success :beer:

shegirl

jacktyler wrote: »

to bring this back on topic, (and i know i said i was bored with little divaz!)

but take a look at this - this really takes the biscuit! :eek:

there are 2 glowing reviews of Little Divaz on google maps.

the first is by a user called city.

City Limos just happens to be the company Little Divaz contracts for limos.
(there is a link to their site from katie's pink limo parties website.

the second review, unbelievably, is actually from Katie herself!!!! she's actually [STRIKE]used[/STRIKE] abused the reviewing system to advertise more services!

it gets better - if you point at the user city's name, you can see they have posted 2 reviews altogether in google maps. you can click this link to read the other review.

it takes you through to city liumo's google maps page and there is a review of city limos, by city!! :rotfl:

there is also a review from Little Divaz UK - username........ ping81 !!!! :rotfl:

is this a stitch-up or what? :eek:

City says 'febolous' and katie says 'fabolous'...even if we couldn't trace who it was somehow all the similar mistakes these people keep writing make it darn obvious:rotfl:

omen666

shellsuit wrote: »

I'm asking you.

You posted Katies personal home address, just because it happens to be her business address, tried to justify it by saying, "Look, I can post this address too" and then posted a NatWest address.

But nobody lives in the NatWest building do they?

Someone lives in Katies house ~ Katie and? BF? Child? Elderly relative?

I don't understand why you posted it anyway, if people want it, it isn't hard to find, but there's no need to highlight it here.

shellsuit wrote: »

I really don't think that is right putting her address on here.

And I explained about the cash payments earlier in this thread.

When people go to do a job at someone elses house, how else apart from CASH are they meant to be paid?

Cheque ~ What if it bounces?

Card ~ Do people walk around with card payment facilities on them?


I agree with everything else on this thread though.

Shellsuit I am surprised at you??? I have seen your posts on MSE and know you are au fait with things like this and very knowledgable too. I also know from previous posts you do not condone the sort of thing Katie is doing here, so I find it surprising you are against a address being placed here? It is in the public domain therefore there is nothing wrong in it. Once Katie registers her websiteher details are available publicly from WHOIS. It would strengthen my statement further if her company was registered at companies house but it is not (is it Katie ).

I bet she wishes she never posted on here under a pseudonym. lol

I am just going to kick back now and

edgex

jacktyler wrote: »

but don't forget that Little Divaz UK appears to have been taken over by Girls Pamper Parties.

that's http://www.girlspamperparties.com/

"Girls Pamper Party Staff
January 24, 2010

Little Divaz UK was sold to us in January 2010 for a huge sum to enable them to pay off their staff training, offiices and lock up debts. We have also brought the Little Divaz UK commericial premises."

http://www.littledivaz.co.uk/little-divaz-uk-headlines.php

hmmm


strange how the gpp site goes straight to the ld site


& strange whats in the google cache:
http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:h8lRPtU-m2wJ:www.littledivaz.co.uk/little-divaz-uk-headlines/girls-pamper-parties-uk+girlspamperparties.com&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

.blog-pagination{ padding-top:20px; } .float-left{ float:left; } .float-right{ float:right; }Girls Pamper Parties UK

Posted by Katie Melissa on Friday, January 15, 2010 Under: Girls Pamper Parties
Little Divaz UK - Girls pamper party company has gone global and has released its .com domain name and has franchised into europe with its first overseas franchise on the island of KOS in greece and a second one in cyprus.

Our .com address is GIRLS PAMPER PARTIES . COM

HTTP://WWW.GIRLSPAMPERPARTIES.COM

Congratulations to Katie Brown for all she has achieved since 2006

so LittleDivaz launched girlspamperparties.com, yet GirlsPamperParty bought them?

hmmm



ooh looky, even more:
http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:1k8whFvj6j0J:www.littledivaz.co.uk/little-divaz-uk-headlines.php+/search%3Fhl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26q%3D%2Bsite:www.littledivaz.co.uk%2Bgirlspamperparties.com&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk


"As previous franchisees of the Little Divaz UK enterprise..."

edgex

pulliptears wrote: »

So far,

http://www.littledivaz.co.uk/
http://www.girlspamperparties.com/
http://pinkprincessparty.co.uk
http://makeoverparties.co.uk/
http://pinklimoparties.yolasite.com/

All 5 can be tied together by telephone numbers, email addresses and WHOIS searches.

http://whois.domaintools.com/littledivaz.co.uk
Registered on: 23-Oct-2008

http://whois.domaintools.com/girlspamperparties.com
created: 25-May-2009

http://whois.domaintools.com/pinkprincessparty.co.uk
Registered on: 25-May-2009

http://whois.domaintools.com/makeoverparties.co.uk
Registered on: 25-May-2009


she was busy in may wasnt she

edgex

http://whois.domaintools.com/childrenspamperpartiesmidlands.co.uk
Registered on: 15-Apr-2009


if anyones contacting Trading Standards over this, they need to get them to ask the registrar for all of the domain names she has registered, & all the ones that have that address as the registrants address

Registrar:
1 & 1 Internet AG [Tag = SCHLUND]
URL: http://registrar.1und1.info

edgex

jacktyler wrote: »

i was thinking how nice little divaz' cakes look (look at the party extras gallery)

http://www.littledivaz.co.uk/gallery.php

most impressive.

i don't know how they can afford to import them all the way from Pretoria, South Africa though, not at their prices.

i'm thinking of asking Treasures and Tiaras Kids Parties if they could send me some, because they look absolutely delicious.

their Flickr account has tonnes of yummy cakes, but i'm sure i've seen these ones somewhere before:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/treasures_and_tiaras/3962280290/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/treasures_and_tiaras/3255987920/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/treasures_and_tiaras/3255988770/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/treasures_and_tiaras/3255154867/

on second thoughts, maybe i'm wrong.

after all, katie's photos have been watermarked with the words: "© Little Divaz UK"

i hope she has permission to use those images, because one thing i can't stand, is people piggy-backing off the hard-work and dedication of others :mad:

either way, it's very misleading to imply that they represent one of her own events.

she cant put anything on them
in fact, she cant even use them, as they, the creators, have copyright over them


you could contact them
http://www.flickr.com/people/treasures_and_tiaras/

& they could then issue a take-down notice



this set dosnt look UK to me
http://www.digicamsoft.com/littledivazuk/estras/images/thumb10.jpg

edgex

jacktyler wrote: »

i have been contacted by Treasures and Tiaras Kids Parties who have informed me that no permission was sought by www.littledivaz.co.uk to use their images and little divaz DO NOT own the copyright.

they have contacted Little Divaz and asked them to remove these images. i hope they will now comply with that request and remove any other material from their website which is in breach of copyright, and apologise to those from whom they have stolen content.

if your in contact with them, this is the host:

http://www.yola.com/report-abuse

edgex

jacktyler wrote: »

the "party extras gallery" containing the offending images has now been removed from little divaz' website.

er, its still linked to from the website

its under 'extras'
http://www.littledivaz.co.uk/prices.php

& is then the link under Birthday Cake

edgex

shellsuit wrote: »

Who lives at Natwest Bank PLC 233 Kings Road, London SW1???

dosnt matter

if you want to operate like a business, then you have to operate in the same way a business does
that means that certain pieces of info are public