We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
TV Licence - No TV
Comments
-
"Under caution" - will there be a police presence?
TVL have no right of access to your property and you do not need to engage in any sort of dialogue with them, should you choose not to do so.
Just to add, just because you don't have a TV doesn't mean you don't need a licence.
Under caution doesn't mean a police presence....
A number of 'enforcement' agencies can use statements supplied for court and as such will 'caution' you to obtain these, it doesn't mean you have to say anything but what you do say could be given in evidence in court. Even if police are not present....
An example of this is
Trading Standards
Revenue Protection Inspectors on the Railway or TfL
etc etc..
It is just a way of making what you say disclosable.These are my thoughts and no one else's, so like any public forum advice - check it out before entering into contracts or spending your hard earned cash!
I don't know everything, however I do try to point people in the right direction but at the end of the day you can only ever help yourself!0 -
You could have a lot of fun with them - if you can be bothered.;)
I did this many years ago, they were convinced that a business we ran was watching TV, we invited them in sat them down and they took statements etc... offered the two inspectors a nice cup to tea and they invited them around every room in the factory!
Only for them to find a TV you could see the excitement on their faces, bingo they thought! It was a shame the TV dated back to the 40's, and had no possible way of receiving TV programmes!
However they were impressed that we were nice to them and they never came back!These are my thoughts and no one else's, so like any public forum advice - check it out before entering into contracts or spending your hard earned cash!
I don't know everything, however I do try to point people in the right direction but at the end of the day you can only ever help yourself!0 -
Under caution doesn't mean a police presence....
A number of 'enforcement' agencies can use statements supplied for court and as such will 'caution' you to obtain these, it doesn't mean you have to say anything but what you do say could be given in evidence in court. Even if police are not present....
An example of this is
Trading Standards
Revenue Protection Inspectors on the Railway or TfL
etc etc..
It is just a way of making what you say disclosable.
Of course since you need not enter any sort of conversation with TVL then they can do nothing - under caution or not;)0 -
TV detector vans work perfectly well at detecting CRT sets, its' the Plasma & LCD ones they have no chance of detecting. This is why when you buy a new (or second hand) set, the seller is legally required to inform TVL of your name and address. Of course, if you pay cash & provide a false name/address, then there is nothing TVL can do.Never Knowingly Understood.
Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)
3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)0 -
TV detector vans work perfectly well at detecting CRT sets, its' the Plasma & LCD ones they have no chance of detecting. This is why when you buy a new (or second hand) set, the seller is legally required to inform TVL of your name and address. Of course, if you pay cash & provide a false name/address, then there is nothing TVL can do.
"Detector vans" DO work - if they exist ! In theory (in fact, in practice) it is perfectly feasible to determine, from a distance, exactly what frequency (channel) a television is tuned to by detecting the Intermediate Frequency it is using to extract the much lower frequency used to display the picture from the higher frequency used to transmit the picture. The type of display, CRT, LED, Plasma, etc is totally irrelevant.
However, this type of evidence is NOT admissable in a Court of Law, for a number of reasons. TV Licensing have admitted in Parliament that "detector van" evidence has NEVER been used in Court.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards