We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Will pre-paid mispriced hotel room be honoured?

1356714

Comments

  • starrystarry
    starrystarry Posts: 2,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I've never worked in retail, so I'm sure you have more experience of that sector than me. I do know the law on this topic though and I respectfully refer you to the following case: Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953]. If you google it I'm sure you'll find all the details.
  • Will look that up now :)

    Back to the OP should they bump up the price the following will cover you...

    The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 creates offences regarding misleading actions and omissions which will include price indications, facilities and accommodation.
  • That case is from 1953? Is that correct?
  • starrystarry
    starrystarry Posts: 2,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes, that's the one.

    Or you could look up Fisher v Bell:

    Fisher v Bell [1961] is a case concerning the requirements of offer and acceptance in the formation of a contract. The case established that, where goods are displayed in a shop together with a price label, such display is treated as an invitation to treat by the seller, and not an offer. The offer is instead made when the customer presents the item to the cashier together with payment. Acceptance occurs at the point the cashier takes payment.
  • All before the following:

    Sales of Goods Act 1979
    The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
    Price Marking Order 2004
    :)

    Do not want to venture away from the OP's orginal worry. But she has paid a price, they accepted (as proven by suplying the voucher) so a contract has been bound, one that is legally binding.
  • starrystarry
    starrystarry Posts: 2,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JamieT1977 wrote: »
    Do not want to venture away from the OP's orginal worry. But she has paid a price, they accepted (as proven by suplying the voucher) so a contract has been bound, one that is legally binding.

    You may well be right on that, I'm not commenting on whether that particular transaction will be honoured. I only replied to your post about price labels in a shop being legally binding. They're not.
  • You may well be right on that, I'm not commenting on whether that particular transaction will be honoured. I only replied to your post about price labels in a shop being legally binding. They're not.

    They are :)
    But like I said I do not want to take this thread of its orginal path :)
  • starrystarry
    starrystarry Posts: 2,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    JamieT1977, you are wrong. starrystarry is correct.

    The SI's you quote do not confer rights on an individual when enforcing a one off price mistake. The common law that starrystarry quotes is still good law, and their explanation is spot on.
    Gone ... or have I?
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    JamieT1977 wrote: »
    All before the following:

    Sales of Goods Act 1979
    The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
    Price Marking Order 2004
    :)

    Do not want to venture away from the OP's orginal worry. But she has paid a price, they accepted (as proven by suplying the voucher) so a contract has been bound, one that is legally binding.

    You have also missed the legal concept of mistake, in which the parties can be put back to their original position if such a glaring error is made, despite a contract apparently having been made.
    Gone ... or have I?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.