We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Carrington Carr Broker Fee and income protection Miss Sold - Reclaim Help
Comments
-
My sincerest apologies for a simple mis-spelling! Ladycare has had a response to her complaint from Carrington Carr. I have taken a complaint about them to the FOS and they are investigating the insurers as CC were acting as agents for them at the time.0
-
Carrington Carr became an Appointed Representative of Legal & General on 2 November 2004 (that is two days after the FSA began regulating residential mortgages. Legal & General has no responsibility for its actions prior to that date.
In addition, the fact that it was responsible for the mortgage advice does not automatically mean it was responsible for the insurance advice which continued to be subject to the GISC code until 13 January 2005.
I think FOS may be misunderstanding this. L&G may misunderstand as well, or it may decide it is not worth fighting - or it may choose to stand its ground.0 -
I have taken a complaint about them to the FOS and they are investigating the insurers as CC were acting as agents for them at the time.
That may be your argument to the FOS but when the FOS actually look at the case and check the regulatory position at the time, the outcome may be very different. Whilst it sits in the pile to be looked at, it isnt doing anything.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
That may be your argument to the FOS but when the FOS actually look at the case and check the regulatory position at the time, the outcome may be very different. Whilst it sits in the pile to be looked at, it isnt doing anything.
No - that's not my argument to the FOS. The FOS have checked the regulatory position at the time and this was their argument.0 -
stitcherooni wrote: »No - that's not my argument to the FOS. The FOS have checked the regulatory position at the time and this was their argument.
They are wrong then. Of course, they may just be looking into the regulatory position at the time and not yet made a decision. In which case, they are right to look but the outcome should be a refusal.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Hi
Could anyone help me with the following, i took a policy out with AWD/ Carrington Carr in Feb 2005 for a mortgage of £59.900 and a MPPI for a period of 5 yrs, at a cost of £3487, which was added to my mortgage, could i claim this back as a miss sold policy, if so, how would i go about this, all and any help regarding this would be much appreciated.
Many thanks
Bobster0 -
bobster610 wrote: »Hi
Could anyone help me with the following, i took a policy out with AWD/ Carrington Carr in Feb 2005 for a mortgage of £59.900 and a MPPI for a period of 5 yrs, at a cost of £3487, which was added to my mortgage, could i claim this back as a miss sold policy, if so, how would i go about this
By that time Carrington Carr was an Appointed Representative of
Legal & General Partnership Services Limited.
Write to them at:
Legal & General House
Kingswood
Tadworth
Surrey
KT20 6EU
Get proof of posting (free from the Post Office) and hang on to it. No need for recorded delivery.0 -
MPPi should be set up monthly premium by direct debit from your current account (or a monthly payment with the mortgage but not charged interest on). Yours was single premium and is an easy complaint. You are effectively paying for that MPPI premium for 25 odd years. Hence why it is nearly always classed as bad advice.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
Many thanks for the feed back, if anone else can help regarding this, then this will be much appreciated, i will send s letter to them, with copies of the agreements and the details, once again, many thanks0
-
You dont need agreements. Indeed, for mortgages there is no point as MPPI doesnt appear on them (even single premium).I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards