G24 Ltd using debt recovery agency

notts_phil

Sirdan wrote: »

My last post on this ,as it is going grossly off topic, but for the unwary or dimwitted a warning do not listen to any advice the poster AXLES gives on law.

Here is an explanation of which planet he is living on (you are free to join him but please don't ever be tempted to try this !!!! in court !!):-


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land

Oh yea ive heard of them now. Think they were in the news last year.

peter_the_piper

Hey, I've been missing all the fun. I love a good foil hat poster.

esmerobbo

Its in Canada but same Queen!



"The judge asked if Thatcher should be examined by psychiatric experts".



http://www.kamloopsnews.ca/article/20110630/KAMLOOPS0101/110639946/merritt-freeman-to-spend-holiday-weekend-in-jail

robtruscott

Sirdan wrote: »

My last post on this ,as it is going grossly off topic, but for the unwary or dimwitted a warning do not listen to any advice the poster AXLES gives on law.

Here is an explanation of which planet he is living on (you are free to join him but please don't ever be tempted to try this !!!! in court !!):-


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land

What Freemen don't seem to understand is that all law in England is ultimately under the jurisdiction of Parliament which can revoke, rewrite, amend or consolidate case law/real common law whenever it sees fit. This is the principle known as Parliamentary sovereignty, where parliament is recognised as the supreme legal authority and being able therefore to pass or repeal any law it wishes, with the only restriction being that it cannot bind future parliaments.
Ultimately, the law derives its authority from the fact that the state has the means and the will to use force to impose it. You can argue that the authorities have no jurisdiction over you, and you can choose not to recognise their authority, but as long as the authorities have force to back up their rules they can enforce sanctions against you. Freemen would argue that this would be unlawful imprisonment - but at the end of the day you'd still be in jail. :D

demelzap

Hi,

After reading this thread I decided not to pay the G24 Contratual Parking Charge Notice I received. However, as my car is a leased company car the leasing company charges £12 admin fee to my company for every letter received from G24. This would quickly build up to the £75 amount if paid early.

Against my better judgement I've now paid it as I didn't want my company forwarding on these admin fees to me as well. I am not sure where I stand on this, I was on company business but this was a mistake on my part. Is there any point in taking this further with my company?

Thanks

Alexis27

You should have looked at the terms and conditions between you and the lease company. They usually only cover legitimate penalties, not any old invoice (and they'd probably fall foul of consumer regs if they did cover invoices).

I don't think there's much you can do now. One plan is to get a friend to invoice the leasing company and then pass on the recovered money to you. Potentially fraudulent and I couldn't possibly recommend it ;-)

markw96

HI, i just recieved this parking ticket on friday and i would just like someone to confirm for me that this is what is being discussed in this thread and that the appropriate action would be just ignore all correspondence from them??? thanks in advance

ok so im not allowed to post a link to photo bucket as a new user??? well that helps alot???

Kite2010

Try posting the links without the http at the front Mark.

If it's from G24 than it's pretty safe to ignore

markw96

i1093.photobucket.com/albums/i432/markw96/editedfine.jpg

if someone could confirm, many thanks in advance

notts_phil

Ignore it all...