Too Good To Be True

Moglex

missile wrote:

I really do not take it so serious as you seem to - I have noted you having a pop at several others.

You took it seriously enough to suggest another site member might be a scumbag.

As to "having a pop" at others, if they make unwarranted accusations against other members, it is quite likely that I'll say something.

As I said I am not too sure what is going on here, seems we were not given the correct story? It appears Kay-UK was the winning bidder and is simply backing out as she has changed her mind. Puts a slightly different context on her subsequent actions, IMHO

First you suggest she might be a scumbag, now you seem to be accusing her of trying to mislead us.

What is your problem with this poster?

missile

soolin wrote:

If a buyer accepts a second chance offer then of course they are shown as the winner and that is exactly what shows in this case.

I did not know this, my appologies

missile

Moglex wrote:

What is your problem with this poster?

As I have already said, I do not have a problem with her, you or anyone else, life is too short. I was merely expressing my point of view. :A

Kay

Thank you for calling me a scumbag and a liar, it's nice to know people judge you without knowing anything about you. I love you too.

Don't know where you're getting that I'm the winning bidder from either - this is what I've got in My Ebay - http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8949826816&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEDW%3AIT&rd=1

I complained to ebay about the P&P, and they didn't reply, so the only way I could see to resolve the problem was to appeal to the seller direct.

And, in my experience, those who profess 'humble opinions' are usually the most opinionated and un-humble people around. If you want a row, PM me don't slag me off in public.