We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BT Connection Charges (merged threads)
Options
Comments
-
Heinz wrote:Edinburghlass - another one for merging with http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=211879 please.
While you're at it, can you make that a sticky?
Done and sticky (for a bit anyway)0 -
assuming its been payed for ever heard of social housing :-)0
-
Hi. Hopefully I can be of some help here.
In my opinion, and this is one shared by BT, the whole system of connection sharges for new lines is a postcode lottery.
I was due to pay £110 for my new line. I had it reduced to £70. I told the operator that I was not going to pay £40 more than a guy in Oxford who had a line put in for £70, simply because my postcode starts with a different letter or because I have a different area code.
I can understand what people have said here about the price of copper, BT's time, the effort that goes into laying down a phone line, and the overall cost in comparison to that of a new house. And ys, £125 compared to over a thousand times that much seems a trifle. However, I can also understand you wanting to save as much as you can.
If you have not already had the line installed, phone up BT and ask them about it. You can even tell them that quite clearly different people are being charged different prices. And NO, it does not depend on the lengthof cables that have to be laid inside your house, or how much work has to be done on the exchange end. I had to have an entire length of cable 'borrowed' from someone else's house and changed to my house, then cabling laid across two floors, and an old cable removed. It took two visits, as underground work had to be done within my own house, as well as that dne above the ground, as the usual white BT box that they connect the wires to did not exist, and the access was beneath the floor.
I told BT that if they really wanted I could give thm names, numbers and customer details of the guys that paid only £70 for their lines, guys tht paid £90 for their line and a girl that paid only £99,99 for their line. Needless to say, they quickly assured me that was not necessary. They also very kindly extended my payment period for the setup fee, and gave me two months to pay it.
Yes, I too agree that BT can be very helpful. As said above, I had to have two engineers work on my line, during two seperate visits. The second time, I had gone for an exam, and when I came back, the engineer was already working away outside, and was in fact waiting for me to get back so he could finish up inside. He aso called back two days later to check everything was OK, got my line registered for broadband activation (not with BT) right away, and also called before he was coming so that I could be in on the first visit (which not all engineers do).
Hope this has helped. As has been said before, it's likely you won't see any reduction in price, but then again, the saying goes that if you don't try, you won't know.
BTW, I was being genuine when I said I could name names and details of the other people who had cheaper line setup fees. Of course, you may get away with just a bluff, but I did have their permission to tell BT this. You never know when they will actually take it upon themselves to check out your story.
Hussein.Know me for who I am, not for who I say I am.0 -
sorry patwa but your postcode or area code has zero relevance to the charges that you pay to bt0
-
I guess after a year or to you would re-coupe the cost of the connection charge using the CPS's!0
-
Patwa, I'm afraid your entire point is amiss. There is no sliding scale of connection charges at BT. You either pay £124.99 or nothing.Comping wins this month: 2 x business class flights anywhere we like | Horse vitamins (!) | New kettle | Motorcycling prints | Signed LPs | Thanks to all!0
-
ahrimaniac wrote:Patwa, I'm afraid your entire point is amiss. There is no sliding scale of connection charges at BT. You either pay £124.99 or nothing.
Patwa may be partially right, in the past there were reduced connection fees for people getting second lines in which was £69 IIRC?0 -
Perhaps, but not new lines - I would hate to think the poster would be calling BT kicking off abuot sliding charges. It'd be entirely fruitless.Comping wins this month: 2 x business class flights anywhere we like | Horse vitamins (!) | New kettle | Motorcycling prints | Signed LPs | Thanks to all!0
-
ahrimaniac wrote:Patwa, I'm afraid your entire point is amiss. There is no sliding scale of connection charges at BT. You either pay £124.99 or nothing.
isnt it.
and the 'drop' second line connection charge is there most likely as a majority of the equipment/resource is there at the address already, so you're paying for labour etc0 -
As the latest price increase came into effect on 1 June 2006 it could also be that these other people who had new lines installed for a lesser amount were pre 1 June.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards