Departures

kelloggs36

If it was awarded via a departure you will have got a letter saying so - under CS1 all dividends will have been counted as income under a normal assessment - not a departure.

CSA_Help

kelloggs36 wrote: »

If it was awarded via a departure you will have got a letter saying so - under CS1 all dividends will have been counted as income under a normal assessment - not a departure.

Thanks Kelloggs

There was no departure then as i said in obe of the other posts they used the dividends for 2002 and carried it on till 2004 and backdated them .I have copies of letters complaining etc but they never acted on it util Sep 2004 .So i will have grounds of getting that taken off mt so called arrears .

So that means they owe me money :j

Wonder how long they will string it out

speedster

kelloggs36 wrote: »

If it was awarded via a departure you will have got a letter saying so - under CS1 all dividends will have been counted as income under a normal assessment - not a departure.

only if the nrp is the majority shareholder though. which isn't the case here as it wasn't his company.

CSA_Help

kelloggs36 wrote: »

If it has been done incorrectly then yes, it can be amended. Write and ask for them to look at it again and respond with a full reason why it is not incorrect.

I called them tonight to pre empt them a letter is coming and the woman said they wouldn't review it as it was refused a review when i complained at the time .They said the accoutant supplied them the details .I asked them to check the records at companies house and even offered her the £1 t followed the correct legislation .Because of the limited time this happened as i was first notified in Dec 2003 it was backdated to Sep 2003 and then reassesed Feb 2004 and backdated to July 2002 .The woman couldn't understand that they had used the wrong dividends per financial year even though they weren't paid to me .She confirmed all the times i called and i have copies of letters i sent . It wasnt until Sep 04 (backdated to July 2004) that my payments went back to £5.60 per week .

There was no mention of departures

CSA_Help

kelloggs36 wrote: »

If it was awarded via a departure you will have got a letter saying so - under CS1 all dividends will have been counted as income under a normal assessment - not a departure.

Kelloggs

Sorry

I have 2 threads going about departures and didvidends

During my conversation there was no mention of a departure in place

kelloggs36

Speed - not under CS1 he doesn't have to be.

Kimitatsu

I have merged the threads to make things easier as it seems to all be about the same issue

CSA_Help

Kimitatsu wrote: »

I have merged the threads to make things easier as it seems to all be about the same issue

Thanks Kimitatsu

speedster

kelloggs36 wrote: »

Speed - not under CS1 he doesn't have to be.

no. but he can successfully appeal their inclusion. it's been done many times.

a fact you seem to have neglected.......... again.

CSA_Help

speedster wrote: »

no. but he can successfully appeal their inclusion. it's been done many times.

a fact you seem to have neglected.......... again.

Heres hoping .They have requested the paperwork from storage but i think the accountant gave them the "wrong figures" on the telephone .I can see clearly now what they have done is reassesed Sep 03 notified in Dec03 Feb 04 reassesed and backdated to July 02 .An over eager employee of the agency maybe