We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Recession may be over tomorrow

123468

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    You can see it in the disconnect between M0 and M4 money supply figures

    There is clearly a huge 'disconnect' between the Governments version of what QE would mean, and the actual results.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kabayiri wrote: »
    This may be a silly question, but...

    why dont they bypass the banks?

    Give direct grants for R&D, product development, or expansion plans etc.

    Because the Government made a political decision to prop up the banks rather than let them go bust. As soon as they did that they went down a very expensive path (potentially).

    My opinion is that insolvent banks should be nationalised and wound up, not propped up. Nobody voted for me though (not that I gave them the chance) so I don't get to do that.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    purch wrote: »
    There is clearly a huge 'disconnect' between the Governments version of what QE would mean, and the actual results.

    Just as there's a big difference between "An end to Tory Boom and Bust" and ending booms followed by 'busts'.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I'm sorry to be in question mode, but....

    Have we to resign ourself to an economy centred on the City of London? What does this mean for the regions?

    I don't see any great plans to generate other revenue streams outside Finance.

    I do know it feels tough right now in Manchester.
  • the new banking code should see an impact, i expect house prices to remain static, and FTB can't easily get into the market
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kabayiri wrote: »
    I'm sorry to be in question mode, but....

    Have we to resign ourself to an economy centred on the City of London? What does this mean for the regions?

    I don't see any great plans to generate other revenue streams outside Finance.

    I do know it feels tough right now in Manchester.

    Well the Great New Labour Myth for the past 12 years has been that the areas ruined by years of Tory power have been brought back to life by Labour.

    The fact is AIUI that the regions apart from London, SE & SW England and (arguably) Scotland have been handsomely subsidised by London, SE England and (very arguably) Scotland. SW England drops out BTW as it pays out in tax pretty much precisely what it gets back in spending.

    So high falutin finance has gone off the boil for a while meaning the SE and London has less money to hand out to the rest of the country. That means the myth is shown as such, the economies of much of Northern England haven't been fixed, just propped up.

    My Granny lived just outside New Mills and I saw a lot of the destruction of Northern industry in the 1980s as her neighbours lost their jobs. I don't see much of consequence that has replaced it since 1997, only subsidies. Subsidies rely on the payer being willing and able to continue paying. Much better to make your own way in the world.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Do you remember the Top Gear shuttle episode ?

    The guys behind that were based in Glossop, just up the road.

    We still have some damn clever engineering people in this country (he says, with biased interest).

    We just don't seem to value engineers anymore. I just finished a call centre system, 2 of the lads working there (team leaders), one was a trained Civil engineer, and the other had a Phd in physics, and had worked on the Hadron collider!

    These are bright people, not really being utilised well.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kabayiri wrote: »
    Do you remember the Top Gear shuttle episode ?

    The guys behind that were based in Glossop, just up the road.

    We still have some damn clever engineering people in this country (he says, with biased interest).

    We just don't seem to value engineers anymore. I just finished a call centre system, 2 of the lads working there (team leaders), one was a trained Civil engineer, and the other had a Phd in physics, and had worked on the Hadron collider!

    These are bright people, not really being utilised well.

    Unfortunately Britain doesn't value engineers, they ar widely mocked as 'boffins' or 'geeks' or whatever.

    I think the world and certainly the UK needs more engineers. !!!!!! was the industrial revolution based upon other than engineering? (apart from slavery, the results of enclosure and economic problems in Holland).
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    Cant believe Gordy managed to !!!! it!!! With over 175 billion pumped in the system and a public sector deficit of 200 billion, this is bad, bad news....
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    michaels wrote: »
    Are we seeing a huge disconnect between the financial sector being buoyed into a QE bubble and the real economy to which the stimulus is resolutely failing to percolate?

    Other than Goldman Sachs where is the evidence of the recovery in the Financial Sector?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.