Landlord kills tenant

sooz

so the fish can stay once the tenant is dead?

chucknorris

sooz wrote: »

so the fish can stay once the tenant is dead?

Only if it pays the rent on time

AMILLIONDOLLARS

Wutang wrote: »

This is about a murder dumbass.
QUOTE]

I take it you have not read the notice at the top of the board, I have not insulted you (have been tempted but have not) I generally find that when someone resorts to insults they feel they are losing the argument.

I Have reported your last post as offensive

AMD

Gwhiz

chewmylegoff wrote: »

quite right too, about time we had something like this. in my view it should be amalgamated with the no pets clause:

"Section 6
6.1 The tenant agrees not to keep mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians or fish including cartialigeous fish in the property
6.2 In return the landlord agrees to not kill the tenant
6.3 In the case of non-compliance by either the tenant or landlord of any of the terms within this section, the entire section is consider void."

AMILLIONDOLLARS wrote: »

Wutang wrote: »

This is about a murder dumbass.
QUOTE]

I take it you have not read the notice at the top of the board, I have not insulted you (have been tempted but have not) I generally find that when someone resorts to insults they feel they are losing the argument.

I Have reported your last post as offensive

AMD

What are you, 6!!! Grow a spine!

ILW

So who murdered the fish then?

chucknorris

ILW wrote: »

So who murdered the fish then?

I think it was the cat who was seething because the fish was allowed to stay, but the cat couldn't afford the rent and had to move out

AMILLIONDOLLARS

Gwhiz wrote: »

AMILLIONDOLLARS wrote: »

What are you, 6!!! Grow a spine!

I have been a regular member of this board since 2004, In all my time here I have not sworn or sworn at another member, if you wish someone to describe you as a DS, that's your business, its nothing to do with be 6 or 60, its about mutual respect for your fellow posters, even when you disagree with their views.

AMD

00ec25

ILW wrote: »

So who murdered the fish then?

the mammal (cat) ate it, as it could not get out since no one was left to look after it
the tenant having been killed, the LL had not had time to evict it via a section 8 for rent arrears, as he had been arrested following a forcible entry effected by the RSPCA (in company with the police of course as they have no right of entry without) following reports of a maltreated distressed animal


OOOPs beaten to it by Chucknorris

dodger1

chucknorris wrote: »

Quite a few I think! In fact I was going to kill some tenants tonight, but your thread has made it too risky now. I also tried to kill some last week but I was a bit tired so just ending up wounding them.

Typical laziness of the British landlord. If you're going to do it do it right.

chewmylegoff

sooz wrote: »

so the fish can stay once the tenant is dead?

i was more thinking that once my landlord has killed me, my girlfriend will be able to get the puppy she has always wanted. if given the choice, i think she'd go for the puppy, but the clause is cunningly drafted so that it only kicks in if the landlord kills me, and not another tenant.