We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can I have a moan? Please feel fee to tell me I'm being an unreasonable cowbag...!
Comments
-
That so called 'important fact' is utterly irellevant.
You do not need a reason to wish to continue communicating in the manner you started and to resist orders from from someone else instructing to you to change.
The way you insist on picking on the innocent party in this matter I think I may well take that above as a compliment coming from you. :cool:
what has your second paragraph got to do with anything> your talking out of you a**e, no one was forcing anyone to change
i think not being able to make a phone call cause your deaf is pretty important fact!!!!
Im not picking on anyone, im not the bully thowing insults at people unlike yourself! it isnt a compliment!0 -
Yes you are.
You are persistently trying to make out that she was in some way to blame for the high handed and dictatorial attitude of the seller when in fact she shares none of the blame whatsoever.
No i havent ive just said she should have stated the facts which would have helped the seller.
Im not blaming jacks - she should have just told us the facts in the first place so we could help her honestly.
Know we all know the facts we are able to sympathise with her and understand why she cant have rung the seller... something had she have told us earlier we would have been able to do.
I dont have an issue with jacks at all, im sure shes a lovely person.. it just didnt help the post that she missed out a little bit of information that would have been useful and we could have been able to assist her better rather than keep saying tojust ring him and asking why she wouldnt when she could withhold her number etc.
had we have known she was deaf we could have helped her better and helped her with the content of an email to send to seller etc.
SORRY jacks if i offended you - i didnt intend to.0 -
sunnysea83 wrote: »Ive not seen a single post that attack her,
So you post with your eyes closed?she failed to mention a very important fact thats she deaf and therefore people didnt understand or know why she wouldnt ring!
Are you ever going to get the salient point into your head.
You do not need a reason to wish to continue communicating in the manner you started and to resist orders from from someone else arbitrarily instructing to you to change.
Do you just subserviently do what complete strangers tell you to do?
Do you feel obliged to list your disabilities in order to justify yourself for not acquiescing with the instructions of complete strangers?0 -
sunnysea83 wrote: »she failed to mention a very important fact thats she deaf and therefore people didnt understand or know why she wouldnt ring!
And "people"
weren't in the least bit interested in the seller's behaviour when they were having so much fun telling jacks it was all her fault. You didn't tell us that you were dyslexic so I might have throught that you would understand that jacks might not want to get into all of her stuff. Besides which what Jacks did was was irrelevant as she was not the problem as proved by what the seller did when Jacks bloke rang him. 0 -
-
sunnysea83 wrote: »No i havent ive just said she should have stated the facts which would have helped the seller.
Im not blaming jacks - she should have just told us the facts in the first place so we could help her honestly.
Know we all know the facts we are able to sympathise with her and understand why she cant have rung the seller... something had she have told us earlier we would have been able to do.
I dont have an issue with jacks at all, im sure shes a lovely person.. it just didnt help the post that she missed out a little bit of information that would have been useful and we could have been able to assist her better rather than keep saying tojust ring him and asking why she wouldnt when she could withhold her number etc.
had we have known she was deaf we could have helped her better and helped her with the content of an email to send to seller etc.
Good Grief!
The FACT was that she initiated email communication with the seller and did not wish to change the method of communication.
She does not need a reason.
Not listing every thought that went through her mind does not count as dishonesty nor does it mean she did not tell us the whole story.0 -
And "people" weren't in the least bit interested in the seller's behaviour when they were having so much fun telling jacks it was all her fault. You didn't tell us that you were dyslexic so I might have throught that you would understand that jacks might not want to get into all of her stuff. Besides which what Jacks did was was irrelevant as she was not the problem as proved by what the seller did when Jacks bloke rang him.
I dont need to tell you im dyslexic however if i was deaf adn couldnt use a phone to ring then i would mention that point as its a useful point and would help replies.
Ive got nothing against jacks, just dont appreciate the buffoon on this site ssending me abusive messages!0 -
sunnysea83 wrote: »if i was deaf and couldnt communicate by phone then yes i would mention it the seller! i thinks a useful point foer them to know
And yet you did not feel the need to inform us of your alleged dyslexia until you wanted to take someone to task for mentioning that you seemed to be having difficulty comprhending what had been written.
Are double standards a speciality of yours?0 -
Good Grief!
The FACT was that she initiated email communication with the seller and did not wish to change the method of communication.
She does not need a reason.
Not listing every thought that went through her mind does not count as dishonesty nor does it mean she did not tell us the whole story.
Your the most annoying person ive meet in my life, you have no concept of seeing anyone but your owns point of view and your a big bully too.0 -
And yet you did not feel the need to inform us of your alleged dyslexia until you wanted to take someone to task for mentioning that you seemed to be having difficulty comprhending what had been written.
Are double standards a speciality of yours?
Sorry does my dyslexia effect me from ringing a seller>??? no!!
you asked why i had difficutly writing and i told you!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards