We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nationwide +1.3 (-6.2 YoY)
Options
Comments
-
-
Check out the mean line.:)
That is the trend line (real house price) on the nationwide graph
As we are at the long term trend line, would people accept if there was stabalisation following that trend going forward?:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
shakerbaby wrote: »Care to comment on it then or just stick your head in the sand? :rotfl:
I comment on it every month, it's getting boring now.
I think you will find that it is many others, that are waiting for another 20% drop that have their heads in the sand.
The market has bottomed - get used to it.0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »As we are at the long term trend line, would people accept if there was stabalisation following that trend going forward?
If prices fell to £100,000 for example, would the trend line still be at £160,000, or would it be lower?0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »If prices fell to £100,000 for example, would the trend line still be at £160,000, or would it be lower?
It would stay where it is. That's the whole point of the line, it's showing the long term trend. Otherwise when the price rose to £200K you would raise the line (etc) in which case it would be the actual prices.0 -
It would stay where it is. That's the whole point of the line, it's showing the long term trend. Otherwise when the price rose to £200K you would raise the line (etc) in which case it would be the actual prices.
So if prices over the next 10 year rose 500%, the trend line would not curve upwards?
What I'm getting at basically is I'm wondering whether the trend line will be pulled up or down by prices.
I think it does, but I'm not too sure. Hence why the trend line on that graph is actually a curve, not a line. If it was a line, it would end up around 120k, not curving up to 160k as it does.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »If prices fell to £100,000 for example, would the trend line still be at £160,000, or would it be lower?
It would be roughly the same.
It's a long term trend with over 20 years of data. (Includes 2 previous crashes)
See here for 2007, the trend line didn't go up did it?
http://nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/jul_2007.pdf:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »It would be roughly the same.
It's a long term trend with over 20 years of data. (Includes 2 previous crashes)
See here for 2007, the trend line didn't go up did it?
http://nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/jul_2007.pdf
Yes, so that does answer my question. The trend line is pulled up alongside prices. In 2 years, the trend has moved from 140k to 160k. (well around 155k).
I'm not really sure what I am trying to prove here, but I think I'm correct in saying that the trend line is just following the average of the ups and downs, therefore does not really give an indication that currently 160k is the level we should be at today.
If it fell to 100k over the next 5 years, the trend line would not sit at 160k or keep rising, it would fall, not slope downwards, but the whole line would be pulled down to a lower figure.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »So if prices over the next 10 year rose 500%, the trend line would not curve upwards?
What I'm getting at basically is I'm wondering whether the trend line will be pulled up or down by prices.
I think it does, but I'm not too sure. Hence why the trend line on that graph is actually a curve, not a line. If it was a line, it would end up around 120k, not curving up to 160k as it does.
In bull world it stays the same if prices drop but curves up if prices rise.
I hope I have clarrified it for you. :beer:0 -
I saw an interesting graph the other day that had HPI ploted month on month (could have been quarter on quarter)
That made 2006-2007 look like the bull trap.
That would certainly fit the graph HPC users love using more than saying the current pike is a bull trap.
i think it was on a link chucky posted but I cant find it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards