We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
csa, how do i get a low weekly payement
Comments
-
But what would validate my claim ?
A court case saying so... ?
The point i am arguing is that society is predisposed to certain conventions. Are you seriously claiming men are considered equal parents ?
They are not, and all the evidence i have ever seen supports that view.
If you are also prepared to admit that women without children are discriminated in their careers and pay packets compared to similarly skilled and educated me....then we have consensus.;)
Not because it is inherently sexist but because society is still set up so that in general the women look after the children. That is a choice that we all at an individual level make, who is going to be the prime carer? Both mum and dad are part of that decision and for a variety of reasons it is almost always mum (partly because dad usually has a higher pay packet and/or more prospects than mum)
If you are saying that a man who is prime carer with a high flying wife would lose custody in a divorce case just because he's a man, then no, I dont agree with you.
Sou0 -
But what would validate my claim ?
A court case saying so... ?
The point i am arguing is that society is predisposed to certain conventions. Are you seriously claiming men are considered equal parents ?
They are not, and all the evidence i have ever seen supports that view.
A court case would be an excellent piece of evidence
Some thing that shows women take precedence because they are women on an offical council website.
It would have to be something that superceded the official evidence that I can find stating that there is no difference.
Like I said - if it's true then you'd think a discriminated bloke would have more than a few words to say about it
Sou0 -
Am I the only one laughing my socks off at the idea that Mark is having a deep and serious debate with me while flirting with Zara?????
Who says men can't multitask :rotfl:
Sou0 -
Am I the only one laughing my socks off at the idea that Mark is having a deep and serious debate with me while flirting with Zara?????
Who says men can't multitask :rotfl:
Sou
Just keeping him on his toes...and it is a very serious debate *hangs head in shame* Hit the snitch button!member #1 of the official warning clique.
:j:D
Feel the love baby!0 -
A court case would be an excellent piece of evidence
Some thing that shows women take precedence because they are women on an offical council website.
It would have to be something that superceded the official evidence that I can find stating that there is no difference.
Like I said - if it's true then you'd think a discriminated bloke would have more than a few words to say about it
Sou
But it won't happen will it ! The public sector is frozen when it comes to such matters. They fall over themselves to adopt equality policies whilst missing the point completely.
Men and women are not the same and therefore will never be equal.
I can't change that,you can't and no matter how hard they try no council official can.0
:shocked: sounds interesting...tell me more:rotfl: This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards