We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Misery of the BTLers and property developers...
Options
Comments
-
There is plenty of guff abot BTLers all being in the Sh*te which just isn't true, I'm happy for the market to correct by around 35% from peak, as I'm seeking to purchase 4 properties with funds released in sept 2007 from the sale of my previous residence. Probably looking at around a total spend of about £600k on the four, with a deposit of between 30 and 40%, held.
Mr Clown maybe a clown but there were plenty of BTLers and developers who were aware of this correction a good time before it occurred, I can happily say that I was one of them.
Could you explain further how this is good?
It's just I have a car, which I bought for £9500 cash, and it's now worth around £6000 cash.
I also have some money I could use to buy another car.
So I too, would like to say that it's good for me that my car has depriciated 30% as it means I have less money overall. It would somewhat make me happier if I thought that because my asset was now worth a lot less, I'm actually better off?0 -
-
FungusFighter wrote: »Prove it :j
So you honesty think there is no difference from investing in property to investing in shares? I know where I would rather have my money.0 -
-
So you honesty think there is no difference from investing in property to investing in shares? I know where I would rather have my money.0
-
FungusFighter wrote: »The only difference mate is it's probably easier to get shot of shares:beer:0
-
-
FTSE 100 19/03/1999 Closed at 6163
FTSE 100 on Friday Closed at 3842
So you would be approx 38% down if you invested 10 years ago.
Average Property prices in 1999 were approx £90,000
Average Property prices today approx £160,000
So you would be approx 80% up if you invested 10 years ago.
I know where I would want my money. Property wins, always.0 -
FTSE 100 19/03/1999 Closed at 6163
FTSE 100 on Friday Closed at 3842
So you would be approx 38% down if you invested 10 years ago.
Average Property prices in 1999 were approx £90,000
Average Property prices today approx £160,000
So you would be approx 80% up if you invested 10 years ago.
I know where I would want my money. Property wins, always.
You wouldn't say that if you were sat on a mortgage of half a million for some sh1thole the ea convinced you was worth £600k done up at the peak and now you couldn't sell for half that:A
Ask Onion Boy if he ever shows his face on this therad again:rotfl::rotfl:
I'd like to see a projection for what you think property will be worth in 2 years while we're at it mate, might be good for a larf:T0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards