nilrems camp for the disappointed to seek solace!

suesie999

DocMartin wrote: »

That's a bit rich coming from you isn't it? When people WERE warning about Icesave you were one of the group of people telling them to stop panicking and calling them headless chickens, lemmings etc. Do you remember that?

oooooh!!! who rattled your cage mate???

if I were you I would butt out, you will have a riot on your hands within minutes...................

KenC_3

I'll jump to the IVA when my money is firmly in my account. Hopefully that will be Tuesday at the latest as I have just fired off many cheques to various banks and buiding societies. I'd hate for them all to bounce .

DocMartin

suesie999 wrote: »

oooooh!!! who rattled your cage mate???

if I were you I would butt out, you will have a riot on your hands within minutes...................

Why? For pointing out blatent hypocrisy?

favemuppet

oql61 wrote: »

NATWest have 6% (including bonus)).
quote]


This is dropping to about 4.3% AER from Monday 1st December - saw it in The Times this morning.

favemuppet

oql61 wrote: »

NATWest have 6% (including bonus).

This is dropping to about 4.3% AER from Monday 1st December.

suesie999

DocMartin wrote: »

Why? For pointing out blatent hypocrisy?

For insulting a really nice guy who has so many followers that he has over 3500 posts on his thread and almost 75,000 views..........you are not welcome here............

amistupid

DocMartin wrote: »

That's a bit rich coming from you isn't it? When people WERE warning about Icesave you were one of the group of people telling them to stop panicking and calling them headless chickens, lemmings etc. Do you remember that?

Completely unnecessary. This thread is for those seeking solace from the Icesave melt down. Opinion as to it's strength or weaknesss prior to it's demise are irrelevant.

suesie999

amistupid wrote: »

Completely unnecessary. This thread is for those seeking solace from the Icesave melt down. Opinion as to it's strength or weaknesss prior to it's demise are irrelevant.

I'll second that :T:T

st

suesie999 wrote: »

I'll second that :T:T

I will third that

DocMartin

suesie999 wrote: »

For insulting a really nice guy who has so many followers that he has over 3500 posts on his thread and almost 75,000 views..........you are not welcome here............

Firstly, I haven't insulted anybody.
Secondly, just because somebody has thousands of "followers" it doesn't mean they are a "nice guy" - read your history books if you need proof of that.
Thirdly, I'm not concerned whether you think I'm welcome here or not. I'm merely highlighting an example of hypocrisy.

You were not on this forum when all the real insults were flying around, aimed at those expressing concern over Icesave just before it collapsed. People were called lemmings, headless chickens & ignorant by - as it later transpired - people who stood to lose a lot of money if Icesave did collapse. Presumably they acted out of self-interest in order to try to stem a run on Icesave - why else would they attempt to deny that there was any problem? If that was the case back then, then why would you expect them to behave any differently in the future? Therefore, isn't it sheer hypocrisy to now be talking about sharing warnings about potential future collapses? I don'tknow what else you'd call it?

I've made my point, you carry on following if you want to.