PPI Reclaiming discussion Part III

booi666

di3004 wrote: »

Can you remember where this was on the forum hun?

The member then perhaps who posted this ?;)

Havent got a scooby doo di,

t takes me all my time to catch up on this thread:rotfl: :rotfl:

marshallka

di3004 wrote: »

That's the one Boo I think I seen as well hun.....

About the signing of the SAR's :rolleyes:

A SAR is about a subject and not the company so if you have a joint account and only one person signs the SAR all the things about the other person will be left out as that would not be legal to send data about the other person. If no-one signs the SAR then the lot will be left out...

dreamer33

booi666 wrote: »

I like the sound of that dreamer baby:rotfl: :rotfl:

PMSL :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: ya soooooooo funny Boo

oscar52

lalina wrote: »

Yes this was an A & L loan I took out in oc 2006 with PPI on top

They are, apparently, a little "snowed under" - they sent me a couple of letters, but final resp i had today was a copy - was apparently begining of Jan - about 10 days after the 56. Givem a call, see if they have an update at all.

booi666

marshallka wrote: »

A SAR is about a subject and not the company so if you have a joint account and only one person signs the SAR all the things about the other person will be left out as that would not be legal to send data about the other person. If no-one signs the SAR then the lot will be left out...

Doh:eek:

O well it will give r lass summat to do monday wont it:rolleyes:

dreamer33

lalina wrote: »

No haven't posted complaint yet - was waiting ot hear what you all thought about requesting a SAR now after complaining to A & L. Cannot just request a SAR while my initial case is being looked at by A & L and soon Ombudsman or does this look badly on my side?

I would request it, you then have more evidence which you may need to give to FOS.

It won't look bad but you need as much evidence as you can get to give to FOS. It would be in your favour to do this

booi666

dreamer33 wrote: »

PMSL :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: ya soooooooo funny Boo

I do have my moments :cool:

di3004

marshallka wrote: »

A SAR is about a subject and not the company so if you have a joint account and only one person signs the SAR all the things about the other person will be left out as that would not be legal to send data about the other person. If no-one signs the SAR then the lot will be left out...

My point here was, like what also Boo had read was something to do with companies copying their customers signatures, it was just worrying at the time thinking they could do this.
I always provide a siggie on mine.;)

marshallka

booi666 wrote: »

Havent got a scooby doo di,

t takes me all my time to catch up on this thread:rotfl: :rotfl:

Cos most of it is not about PPI and is more like MSN:eek:

Just sign the SAR again and don;t forget to send it recorded delivery.

lalina_2

booi666 wrote: »

Hi marsh,

Some mo fo on one of these forums:eek:

this is funny. I aslo remember that advice here about not signing anything incase they copy your signature and paste it so I've just printed my name instead of my usual signature - what implications will this have?