Injured in Tesco's

uktim29

petrafyde wrote: »

For a start a huge vase should be on the bottom shelf, not the top one! It's common sense?

Actually we don't know if it was "huge", also we don't know that in that section the lower items weren't heavier.

petrafyde

uktim29 wrote: »

Actually we don't know if it was "huge", also we don't know that in that section the lower items weren't heavier.

Vases aren't light objects as a rule, or short for that matter. For it to be on the top shelf is stupidity. Surely its common sense that something taller is more likely to fall over? Just my thoughts.

Yep 'huge' was an assumption.

uktim29

petrafyde wrote: »

Vases aren't light objects as a rule, or short for that matter. For it to be on the top shelf is stupidity. Surely its common sense that something taller is more likely to fall over? Just my thoughts.

Yep 'huge' was an assumption.

Tesco are going to sell object heavier than vases, they also probably sell them in different sizes.

I think it's too much of an assumption assuming they were the heaviest item or the tallest.

petrafyde

uktim29 wrote: »

Tesco are going to sell object heavier than vases, they also probably sell them in different sizes.

I think it's too much of an assumption assuming they were the heaviest item or the tallest.

Yes I agreed it was an assumption.

I wasn't aware there were stages of assumption-ness though, so thanks for clarifying there is a ranking system when it comes to assumptions! I am enlightened, and feel empowered with the extra bit of knowledge you've given me :dance:

So, just to make it clear, my assumption was more of an assumption than normal assumptions - but the real question is, does it rank highly in the hall of fame for assumptions, or was it really not that important?

Pink_fluff

Well said harris. :T

hollydays

What a disgusting post.Funny how these posters always
have the 5 or 10 posts .
"Born with a deformity"
Pinkfluff,you have already had one of your offensive posts removed, if ever there was a more deceptive username "Pinkfluff"-as the song says "nothing sweet about .."you"..

uktim29

hollydays wrote: »

as the song says "nothing sweet about you"..

Nothing sweet about me isn't it!;)

hollydays

if you. look at my post..see the dots..

Pink_fluff

hollydays wrote: »

What a disgusting post.Funny how these posters always
have the 5 or 10 posts .
"Born with a deformity"
Pinkfluff,you have already had one of your offensive posts removed, if ever there was a more deceptive username "Pinkfluff"-as the song says "nothing sweet about .."you"..

Yes I noticed you had my post removed. but I have posted nothing offensive in my last post, so what you on about? I have never claimed any fame to that song. And I am not sweet. Stick to the day job eh, nobody wants to hear your kareoke efforts.

hollydays

No you are definitely not sweet,or fluffy ..ha ha