We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Injured in Tesco's

1…192021222325»

Comments

  • taxiphil
    taxiphil Posts: 1,980 Forumite
    uktim29 wrote: »
    Can I answer?

    I remember you suggesting you have qualifications in law being better than a law degree from Camebridge.

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=14658527#post14658527

    If you look at what I said in context (instead of deleting the relevant part of my sentence from your quote), I said that I'm better qualified in law if we're to believe the absurd idea that Cambridge University dish out law degrees without assessing students on the most basic foundation-level elements of contract law.

    (Hint - I was being sarcastic as it's clearly inconceivable that the person in question really did have a law degree from Cambridge.)
  • Peteo
    Peteo Posts: 47 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    d.edna wrote: »
    Why are people slating harris for his deep thoughts? I mean free speech and all (Im not agreeing or disagreeing with what he said)


    Because they are ignorant and offensive, fairly obviousl really.
  • d.edna
    d.edna Posts: 701 Forumite
    Peteo wrote: »
    Because they are ignorant and offensive, fairly obviousl really.
    As I said, I'm not agreeing with him nor do I condone what he said, I was mearly saying he expressed his opinion.
  • Peteo
    Peteo Posts: 47 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tozer wrote: »
    Tim - really not sure you understand the rationale for tortious damages under English law. Its not to make anyone 'happy', or to give them a windfall. It is to compensate for pain and suffering and lost earnings.

    Absolutely, Tim misses the point once again.
  • d.edna
    d.edna Posts: 701 Forumite
    Peteo wrote: »
    Absolutely, Tim misses the point once again.
    Are you a member here? Like under another name?
  • Peteo
    Peteo Posts: 47 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    d.edna wrote: »
    Why are people slating harris for his deep thoughts? I mean free speech and all (Im not agreeing or disagreeing with what he said)

    Go on now.... be bold agree or disagree....
  • d.edna
    d.edna Posts: 701 Forumite
    Peteo wrote: »
    Go on now.... be bold agree or disagree....
    I'd disagree with what he said, but that doesn't mean he isn't entitled to say whatever he likes
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture