DooYoo - Get Paid to Write Reviews Online

Make_do_and_mend

Fiver29 wrote: »

I don't see how, you would have to go through hundreds of profiles to find a couple of lines in one profile.

All you have to do is go back to the first couple of reviews, look at the date and the time coinciding with your post and bingo...not that hard really. As the person in question states, quoting their profile helps too.

xxfoxyredxx

I will just add though that I don't have a problem with fivers rating to me. If she deems my reviews to be useful that's fine. She was here knocking at me and I had messages on Dooyoo about it and I had to register to come on here to reply to this post and the only reason I did was because other people said to come look as it was obviously stuff quoted from my profile. I havent looked at any other threads on here or added to any other posts as I have no interest.

Fiver29

Make_do_and_mend wrote: »

All you have to do is go back to the first couple of reviews, look at the date and the time coinciding with your post and bingo...not that hard really. As the person in question states, quoting their profile helps too.

Yes, you're right I guess you could look through the reviews, however I wouldn't have presumed many people would have the time or the inclination to then read the profiles of all the people who rated all the reviews.

I've certainly seen a a lot of posts complaining about different reviewers on Dooyoo (not just on here), but I've never known who they were discussing, nor had the time to find out.

And Foxyred, I didn't pick a fight with you (quite frankly saying I picked a fight but didn't expect you to find out is also strange, as what is the point of picking a fight with someone who wouldn't know you'd picked a fight :rolleyes: ), I made statements based on facts. I haven't lied nor accused anyone of lying.

xxfoxyredxx

Just bear in mind people do take note of who says what and when etc even if you and I don't. As I say if I hadnt of been told by several members you were ripping me I wouldn't have known anything about it.

Your post and your moans in general are not based on FACT only what you BELIEVE it to be. As I have said you dont know me so don't presume to know why I rate the way I do etc. You could have asked it's as simple as that really.

I don't know why your annoyed at your ratings considering they were not good reviews (in my opinion). Maybe you have got better in more recent time? Most of us have improved from first reviews we wrote on the site. You never gave me a chance to continue reading your more recent reviews and I don't want to now. I am finding myself on repeat with this subject as you simply twist words to suit yourself.

Make_do_and_mend

Fiver29 wrote: »

Yes, you're right I guess you could look through the reviews, however I wouldn't have presumed many people would have the time or the inclination to then read the profiles of all the people who rated all the reviews.


It was easy - it took about 60 seconds, there weren't many who had rated that low and as recent as yesterday.

Fiver29

xxfoxyredxx wrote: »

I don't know why your annoyed at your ratings considering they were not good reviews (in my opinion). Maybe you have got better in more recent time? Most of us have improved from first reviews we wrote on the site. You never gave me a chance to continue reading your more recent reviews and I don't want to now. I am finding myself on repeat with this subject as you simply twist words to suit yourself.

I'm not annoyed by low ratings, just revenge ratings. Lots have people have rated my reviews U or SU, and that's fine if that is what they think. Revenge rating is a completely different thing.

I would actually prefer that people rated properly rather than on the length of a rating.

xxfoxyredxx

Look Fiver I rated you fairly that's that and I don't know when I rated you or you me like I say I don't take alot of notice of who's doing what I can't say that any clearer to you. If you rated me yesterday I haven't rated you between then and now so you'd of revenge rated me so I'm not sure what your on about now? If I have then I've proved to myself more than anyone I haven't revenge rated because I haven't seen a low rate from you! I personally haven't come across any revenge raters before you brought this subject up either and find Dooyoo to be an incredibly fair site with great members.

Make_do_and_mend

This is a quote - "I would actually prefer that people rated properly rather than on the length of a rating.[/quote]

Just for the record - I don't rate according to length either, I just felt that the review in question, had lots of opinion and detail about what the product is like. I thought that was the point of the site? 70 other people agreed with me - how many agreed with your view?

Surely most people don't have time to scrutinise every single word they write in the hope that they have chosen the exact points people want to know about.

This is my point - your rating was in isolation and coupled with your comments about the persons profile, it is not unreasonable to question your motivation for your choice of rating in the first place.

Fiver29

xxfoxyredxx wrote: »

Maybe you have got better in more recent time? Most of us have improved from first reviews we wrote on the site. You never gave me a chance to continue reading your more recent reviews

You've actually rated 53 of my reviews with 50 VU's, 1 U (the first rating you gave me) and the 2 SUs (given after I rated yours U)

Fiver29

Make_do_and_mend wrote: »

70 other people agreed with me - how many agreed with your view?

As has been said countless times on here, a thousand people could think something is VU, and you might only think it's worth SU. Just because the majority rate one way, it's not a reason to rate VU.

I really couldn't care if the entire population of Dooyoo thought a review was VU, I rate as I find.

ETA: I also think you maybe looking at the second review not the first which was rated U. As I said earlier I hadn't looked at the profile until after receiving the revenge rate from the first U.