We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is 43 too old for a baby
Comments
-
summarising the above posts for you
1. NO it's not too old physically - some higher risks but lots of poepole do it
2. YES it's too old - if you think you have to be <43 at birth
3. NO it's not too old - if you are in the right space in your life to have a baby
4. YES - you will have different adjustments to make than if you were 34 or even 17, but its never easy and you always have to make adjustmentsI think I saw you in an ice cream parlour
Drinking milk shakes, cold and long
Smiling and waving and looking so fine0 -
One of the most shocking things I ever read was an article about female fertility in one of those Sunday newspaper colour supplements a few years ago: that statistically a woman on her 40th birthday is 50% less likely to conceive than she was on her 39th and that the possibility decreases by half every succeeding year. Shocking because I did not know that. But I do know quite a lot of women who have had babies in their forties, I even know a woman who has had two babies in her fifties (albeit via IVF) and she and her husband have never been happier, ever. Fortunately, we are all unique individuals rather than mere statistics.
I say, if you and your husband dearly want and have the mental, physical and economic wherewithall to raise a family, then just get on with it and live happily ever after. The lack of immediate family is a reasonable concern but I doubt any child ever knew suffering because of it. We all form emotional attachments every day of our lives and the heart cares not whether those attachments are blood-connected or not.0 -
BitterAndTwisted wrote: »I say, if you and your husband dearly want and have the mental, physical and economic wherewithall to raise a family, then just get on with it and live happily ever after. The lack of immediate family is a reasonable concern but I doubt any child ever knew suffering because of it. We all form emotional attachments every day of our lives and the heart cares not whether those attachments are blood-connected or not.
Great reply! Was just about to reply myself when I spotted this and I couldn't have put it better!!
All the very best of luck if you decide to go for it OP!
CG. xNew Year, New Me!!!Weight loss mission 2012 has officially begun!!:jLoss so far: 3 stone 4lbs:j0 -
I would go for it, see what happens, start trying.
I would imagine it won't be as easy to fall pregnant in your 40's :-(.
We have family around us and they are useless and we are very much on our own and manage fine. Regardless of your age you will be tired.
Good luck :-)0 -
no way would I want an 18 year old right now0
-
Wouldn't it be lovely if EVERY baby born into the world was a wanted baby...
I was an older mum - not that old but still...
yes they're hard work, expensive, etc etc but I wouldn't be without my two.
No one knows what the future holds.
As long as you have written a will and appointe dguardians you will have done all you can.
Best of luck with it
Agree completely. If you both really want a child and will love to bits then get cracking tonight (after taking the folic acid).
Time is not on your side.
Had my last (DD) at just under 40, could be missing out on doing things - but they'll still be able to be done later along the line. Would not change a thing - DD makes me laugh more than anything else in the world.Please do not quote spam as this enables it to 'live on' once the spam post is removed.
If you quote me, don't forget the capital 'M'
Declutterers of the world - unite! :rotfl::rotfl:0 -
I would say no 43 is not too old to have a baby but the only downside is whether you have the ability to get pregnant, I am also 43 and been trying for my first child for 15 years, and no luck, have even tried two rounds of ivf but still nothing, it would seem that for some women at our age our eggs are no longer good, we are hopefully now looking at adoption. I think you should go for it, you dont want to regret it later in life.
Good Luck2010 - Goals
1. on the long road to hopefully adopting a child - Home Visit 3 Feb 2010
2. Planning to clear my credit card debt.
3. lose weight.
0 -
I don't think it is too old at all my Aunty was the same age when she started her 2nd family, they are now 20 & 21 she is still here, same with my Nanna her youngest was born when she was in her 40's, he is now 40 an my Nanna is still here, she has watched his children grow up too.
If it is what you and your husband really want then go for it. Guardians ect are something any parent of any age needs to concider. As another poster said the child having no immediate family is no big issue strong bonds are created everyday without blood ties x0 -
-
My mother in law was 53 when she had my husband, her 12th child and he was a great uncle as soon as he was born. She died when she was 96 so she was around for him and her masses of grandchildren, my youngest son is the 62nd, great grandchildren, great great grandchildren etc. She was very wise and a great mother in law and Nan and I know none of us would have managed without her, I only had 3 and couldn't manage!
You don't know what is around the corner in life just go for it, don't worry about what anyone thinks, all a child needs is loveLoretta0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards