We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
60 Cyclists To Sue Edinburgh Council
Comments
-
Check this guy out who "thinks" it's ok to jump a red light because he's turning left. The guy looks old enough to know the law but clearly he dosn't. Priceless (This one's for Brat)
http://youtu.be/V83XKkVYZ-IPLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
:beer: Of course. And the idiots amongst us sometimes gives the responsible road users of certain groups (bus drivers, taxi drivers, van drivers, motorcyclists, pedal cyclists...) a bad name.
You do understand that developing an opinion of one person based on the behaviour of another is called prejudice.Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.0 -
Check this guy out who "thinks" it's ok to jump a red light because he's turning left. The guy looks old enough to know the law but clearly he dosn't. Priceless (This one's for Brat)
http://youtu.be/V83XKkVYZ-I
I've said many times that one of the biggest problems law abiding cyclists face is the weak minded mentality possessed by some road users that seeks to blame and subordinate all cyclists because of the behaviour of the law breakers.
So while the red light jumping cyclist might be the catalyst for the problems, the real problem for the cyclist lies with the motorist who justifies his anti-cyclist thoughts and deeds by the actions of the law breaker.Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.0 -
I've said many times that one of the biggest problems law abiding cyclists face is the weak minded mentality possessed by some road users that seeks to blame and subordinate all cyclists because of the behaviour of the law breakers.
So while the red light jumping cyclist might be the catalyst for the problems, the real problem for the cyclist lies with the motorist who justifies his anti-cyclist thoughts and deeds by the actions of the law breaker.
Obviously that's aimed at me (and possibly a few others who have contributed to the thread). Well I can assure you that I agree with the sentiments of the cab driver at the end of the clip apart from his estimation of 2% of cyclists who give 98% a bad name. I would put it a bit higher than that.... maybe as much as 23% following my recent drive along Euston Road in London.PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
You do understand that developing an opinion of one person based on the behaviour of another is called prejudice.
Sorry missed this. Call it what you like but your are wrong. I am not prejudiced against all cyclists at all, just the stupid ones
Footy time now so i'll leave you to it.PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
brat wrote:So while the red light jumping cyclist might be the catalyst for the problems, the real problem for the cyclist lies with the motorist who justifies his anti-cyclist thoughts and deeds by the actions of the law breaker.
If the cap fits tilt. But no, it's not actually directed at you individually. Many people such as you, Altarf and Johno are prejudiced against cyclists. That's OK, we can dismantle that on forums such as this quite easily. It's OK as long as no action is taken against cyclists as a consequence of that prejudice.Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.0 -
Sorry missed this. Call it what you like but your are wrong. I am not prejudiced against all cyclists at all, just the stupid ones
Footy time now so i'll leave you to it.
And I've said before that being prejudiced is never a good way to be, it's not a good way to think, and it's certainly not something to be proud of.Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.0 -
And I've said before that being prejudiced is never a good way to be, it's not a good way to think, and it's certainly not something to be proud of.
So your'e not prejudiced against criminals or people who break the law then? You think they should be treated the same as law abiding people?PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
So your'e not prejudiced against criminals or people who break the law then?
Of course I'm not prejudiced against criminals. You need to learn what the word means.You think they should be treated the same as law abiding people?Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.0 -
Of course I'm not prejudiced against criminals. You need to learn what the word means.
Lol! You were the one who bought the word "prejudice" into the argument, not me.
I readily admit that I am highly critical of irresponsible road users and reckless cyclists. I call it "critical", you called it "prejudice".PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards