What ever happened to the ICE Fitter?

cavycrazy_2

mdbarber wrote: »

I agree but only because of the same repetitive non sense being handed out,
Time and time again you have been proved wrong on both your posting of said SOGA and interpretation of it, LET LOOK AT THE FACTS!

1. I did indeed reject goods under soga
2. incarexpress have failed to refund me my money
3. incarexpress continue to offer less than my legal rights.
These believe it or not are undisputed, undeniable FACTS and whilst I state these perhaps over aggressively, that does not change what they are.
Any other relevant facts?, because I for one would welcome them

1) You accepted them when you fitted them and they worked. It was only when you tried to bluetooth it and knackered it that you decided you didn't want it and clung on to the soga like a drunk clings to a lamp-post, for support, not because it will do him any good in the long run.

2) ice have offered to refund your money once they have been given chance to ascertain if indeed the goods have a fault that is not user-generated.

3) ice are continuing to offer to refund your money once they have been given chance to ascertain if indeed the goods have a fault that is not user-generated.

4) relevant facts are that ice will give you your postage back if, as you say, the radio is actually broken due to a design fault or mechanical breakdown or whatever, not because someone who didn't know what he was doing bodged it up.

mdbarber

cavycrazy wrote: »

1) You accepted them when you fitted them and they worked. It was only when you tried to bluetooth it and knackered it that you decided you didn't want it and clung on to the soga like a drunk clings to a lamp-post, for support, not because it will do him any good in the long run.

2) ice have offered to refund your money once they have been given chance to ascertain if indeed the goods have a fault that is not user-generated.

3) ice are continuing to offer to refund your money once they have been given chance to ascertain if indeed the goods have a fault that is not user-generated.

4) relevant facts are that ice will give you your postage back if, as you say, the radio is actually broken due to a design fault or mechanical breakdown or whatever, not because someone who didn't know what he was doing bodged it up.

So in your first line you accept I had not had the chance to test all features? and you dare to libel me by stating I had damaged the device!!! not looking good is it?
You have already stated you would not purchase from these people because of their T&C's, is there a lack of trust there?, if so then surely I must be right?

Do you actually have any evidence of any of your statements after that? btw gossip is not admissible evidence

cavycrazy_2

mdbarber wrote: »

So in your first line you accept I had not had the chance to test all features? and you dare to libel me by stating I had damaged the device!!! not looking good is it?
You have already stated you would not purchase from these people because of their T&C's, is there a lack of trust there?, if so then surely I must be right?

Do you actually have any evidence of any of your statements after that? btw gossip is not admissible evidence

I don't know whether you have damaged the device or not - nobody does unless you let ICE do what they have been asking to do for the last six months and, you know, LOOK at the thing!

No, I wouldn't have bought from them upon reading their terms and conditions. Their terms and conditions were clearly laid out and, were I in the market for a car stereo, would not have been acceptable to me and I would have gone elsewhere for my product, somewhere where the terms were acceptable to me. But you didn't read the terms for some reason and in buying the item, you accepted the terms. Ignorance isn't a defence.

I'll get back to you on the gossip question when I actually figure out what you're on about. :rolleyes:

mdbarber

cavycrazy wrote: »

1) It was only when you tried to bluetooth it and knackered it

Ummmm,

Well as stated TS said if the judge feels it necessary or if requested to by the defendants he can order an "independent" report. maybe it may happen in the first hearing as i suspect there may be more thatn one the way incarexpress are going about things.
In the latest letter from incarexpress they said they would apply to have any hearing at a more suitable venue to them, when i passed this on to the TS guy he actually told me that a judge can then order a hearing to see if the actual hearing should be moved, i nearly pe'ed myself laughing!!

deanos

All this over a £6 postage charge, crazy

kellymundy

Why does everyone keep feeding the forum trolls! Let them fish all they like just don't bite!

Freddie_Snowbits

Oh dear what did I restart.:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

mdbarber wrote: »

lol but the thread was up to a couple of hundred hits a day, some peeps are interested!

No, we are just so intriged that you can remain out of pocket for the sake of £6 in postage and can find time to expend your energy on this board, but cannot take a ten minute hike down the Post Office!

Beside, when you lose, are you going to sue Trading Standards for bad advice? I can give you information for a fixed rate if you need it later. I am accepatble to PMs!

kellymundy wrote: »

Why does everyone keep feeding the forum trolls! Let them fish all they like just don't bite!

I would, but here we have gone passed feeding the trolls, I've got me spade out an I'm bait digging now!
:beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:

mdbarber

cos it's fun?

dmg24

mdbarber wrote: »

So in your first line you accept I had not had the chance to test all features? and you dare to libel me by stating I had damaged the device!!! not looking good is it?
You have already stated you would not purchase from these people because of their T&C's, is there a lack of trust there?, if so then surely I must be right?

Do you actually have any evidence of any of your statements after that? btw gossip is not admissible evidence

Oh my god now he is accusing cavycrazy of libel! :rotfl:

cc, if he takes you to court, can we all come and watch please?

I can see the headlines now:

Real life Victor Meldrew finally gets his day in court ... and loses!

mdbarber

dmg24 wrote: »

Oh my god now he is accusing cavycrazy of libel! :rotfl:

cc, if he takes you to court, can we all come and watch please?

I can see the headlines now:

Real life Victor Meldrew finally gets his day in court ... and loses!

as far as accusing read the line presented, with your "Legal experience and/or training" you should be able to tell us whether it is or not!
As for TV analogies Mrs Bucket I really am nothing like Victor Meldrew although one thing we do have in common is a nagging woman with little substance constantly being a pain in our faces :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: