Urgent advice please!!

Captain_Mainwaring_2

prudryden wrote: »

What an idiotic post??

Read the absolute cr4p posted by Bodie and Doyle in the previous post.

The answer is in "available/applicable" and normal easements.

Here endeth dealing with idiots for one night.

And I add that the OP would do well not mention his planned alternate use of the garage.
Next?

prudryden

Captain_Mainwaring wrote: »

Read the absolute cr4p posted by Bodie and Doyle in the previous post.

The answer is in "available/applicable" and normal easements.

Here endeth dealing with idiots for one night.

How increditably stupid!!

Captain_Mainwaring_2

prudryden wrote: »

How stupid of you!

Wait and see sweetheart - it's the answer, a good lawyer will draft a nice letter around the difference between "applicable" as applied to the plot having a garage, and "available" regarding the plot having a garage but no power.

Or get your olympic rabbit to dig a cable way.

increditably ??

prudryden

Captain_Mainwaring wrote: »

Wait and see sweetheart - it's the answer, a good lawyer will draft a nice letter around the difference between "applicable" as applied to the plot having a garage, and "available" regarding the plot having a garage but no power.

Or get your olympic rabbit to dig a cable way.

You get dumber every post - didn't think it could get that bad.

Captain_Mainwaring_2

I bet you I'd get power put on in that house without recourse to a lawyer or paying one penny.

Where is your answer then Moneypenny?

bubblesmoney

Captain_Mainwaring wrote: »

It's a missing power supply, not Lord Lucan.



And in the next breath you tell the OP to potentially libel the builder??

No win no fee lawyers would take a look at it - have you been on the Junior Disprins??

Sod me sideways, you mean that you can't use the car lights when parking up at night? You probably can't get the car in the bloody thing.



You need to take a good long rest.

looks like someone is having a bad hangover headache.

the OP is entitled to get what he was promised and paid for and a garage with electricity is just that. he might have problems proving his case and i was suggesting ways to build that evidence. it is what i would do. what you would do or feel about my post is no concern of mine.

i never said it wasnt possible to get the electricity without lawyers. maybe all it needs is a few strongly worded letters and discussions with people higher up the ladder at that development. have a nice day

guppy

Captain_Mainwaring wrote: »

Wait and see sweetheart - it's the answer, a good lawyer will draft a nice letter around the difference between "applicable" as applied to the plot having a garage, and "available" regarding the plot having a garage but no power.

The "applicable" bit was in the brochure, and the brochure is irrelevant. It will invariably say that anything in it can be changed at any time and that the purchaser shouldn't rely on it, but rather on the actual contract itself etc. etc.

On the other hand the salesperson may have made a misrepresentation when they assured the purchaser they that the garage had power.

prudryden

Captain_Mainwaring wrote: »

I bet you I'd get power put on in that house without recourse to a lawyer or paying one penny.

Where is your answer then Moneypenny?

What such a stupid little man does is of no concern to anyone here?

Captain_Mainwaring_2

guppy wrote: »

The "applicable" bit was in the brochure, and the brochure is irrelevant. It will invariably say that anything in it can be changed at any time and that the purchaser shouldn't rely on it, but rather on the actual contract itself etc. etc.

On the other hand the salesperson may have made a misrepresentation when they assured the purchaser they that the garage had power.

The brochure constitutes part of a proposal/offer etc - I'd very much doubt if the contract even mentioned power to the garage. Do all the other garages have power? The issue of a cable crossing another property is nothing. Look at the drawing provided with the contract.

Pru? Go sober up and then have a shave -

Captain_Mainwaring_2

bubblesmoney wrote: »

looks like someone is having a bad hangover headache.

the OP is entitled to get what he was promised and paid for and a garage with electricity is just that. he might have problems proving his case and i was suggesting ways to build that evidence. it is what i would do. what you would do or feel about my post is no concern of mine.

i never said it wasnt possible to get the electricity without lawyers. maybe all it needs is a few strongly worded letters and discussions with people higher up the ladder at that development. have a nice day

No hangover - it's time to go out.

Thanks for the good wishes - I'm in Bangkok, bet I have a nicer day than you.