MSE in court,,,

cavycrazy_2

mdbarber wrote: »

this thread is no where near as strange as the inability of some people to understand the very simplest of facts

SELF-EDITED due to too many spelling mistakes from typing whilst choking with laughter.

cavycrazy_2

mdbarber wrote: »

this thread is no where near as strange as the inability of some people to understand the very simplest of facts

Actually, I'm seriously considering entering this post for the £50 post of the month award. It might not have been helpful to me, but it certainly gave me a good twenty minutes of merriment.

Freddie_Snowbits

uktim29 wrote: »

You've seen what he's like here, can you imagine what he'll be like in court!

Perhaps MSE in an effort to save face on all, we should sell seats at £10 each. I could do the Hotdogs and have Film Rights. This way if more than 20 of us turn up, hey presto, both parties happy, an impromptu MSE get together and the excess could be used to liquidate a local bar afterwards.

cavycrazy_2

In all seriousness (honestly) is it legal for the radio firm to print off the original thread and use it as evidence in court? I don't recall giving permission for my posts to be used for this purpose and will go for quite a large sum of compensation if any of my words are used in court.

OP, can you clarify? Is it the whole thread or just your posts that they are using?

Freddie_Snowbits

cavycrazy wrote: »

Actually, I'm seriously considering entering this post for the £50 post of the month award. It might not have been helpful to me, but it certainly gave me a good twenty minutes of merriment.

I do not want to blow your head off, but this is the second thread.

Here is the first thread, from the top. Do you think it would make a decent half hour sitcom?

mdbarber wrote: »

Got both sides telling me they are right??

Buying A car Stereo Online?

cavycrazy wrote: »

OP, can you clarify? Is it the whole thread or just your posts that they are using?

I think it is the OPs ability to read T&Cs that they are interested in! As for clarity, some of us has been waiting a while!

cavycrazy_2

Freddie_Snowbits wrote: »

I do not want to blow your head off, but this is the second thread.

Here is the first thread, from the top. Do you think it would make a decent half hour sitcom?

Yeah, I know, I got just as many laughs out of the first one. It was this specific post of MDB's that should get some kind of award though, when you consider that he admits to making a purchase without reading the t's and c's that admittedly, stitched him up like a kipper, but were in fact, t's and c's.

this thread is no where near as strange as the inability of some people to understand the very simplest of facts

It would make an excellent sitcom, but if we have another month of this, I think you should go for a six-parter.

Tozer

mdbarber wrote: »

well freddie , and all other, helpful people, i promise no more non-sense if i can make a simple request for help?
In all sets of terns and conditions published by companies there is a disclaimer that goes something like this
"Your statutory rights remain unaffected"
Anyone care to expand or state where this comes form?

Isn't it obvious?

mdbarber

well peeps in very simple language so you can understand, if you find the answer to the above question you will answer every other question you have raised and realise just how foolish all your "anti" statements are.

MothballsWallet

uktim29 wrote: »

I had images of Frank Spencer!

Frank Spencer being defended by Denny Crane! Now that would be insanely funny! :rotfl:

Freddie_Snowbits

mdbarber wrote: »

well peeps in very simple language so you can understand, if you find the answer to the above question you will answer every other question you have raised and realise just how foolish all your "anti" statements are.

Just a polite note to MB. I thnks tis you peoples are winding up, not us, we're here for the ...:beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:

(Note if this thread continues, I am going to be on a post a day before long!)