MSE in court,,,

mpython

mdbarber wrote: »

@graym-me
Yes the first offer i received from ice mentioned the "meester report", i may have thanked them for acknowledging they were blatantly in breech of at least one consumer protection act and would gladly pass this on to the court

Was their offer sent "without prejudice"? If so, you can't show it to the court but they can if they withdraw the "without prejudice" status.

mdbarber

mpython wrote: »

Was their offer sent "without prejudice"? If so, you can't show it to the court but they can if they withdraw the "without prejudice" status.

I'm sorry, i cant show it to the court how? is this not a free country?

mute_posting

mdbarber wrote: »

I'm sorry, i cant show it to the court how? is this not a free country?

Not if they state "without prejudice" - AFAIK it is quite a common legal term used in lots of such preliminary negotiations.

Perhaps if you stop slagging off dmg24 and ask nicely, she will explain it.

MP

EDIT

this may help if you have already burnt all bridges with dmg...

http://www.geoffreyleaver.com/resources/resource.asp?DeptID=2&SubDeptID=126&toolkitid=130

unfortunately, you maye have scuppered your chances though

you must not reveal the content of ‘without prejudice’ negotiations, or you can forfeit your right to confidentiality

grayme-m

mdbarber wrote: »

I'm sorry, i cant show it to the court how? is this not a free country?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice_(law)

mdbarber

grayme-m wrote: »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice_(law)

nowt there m8,

mute_posting

mdbarber wrote: »

nowt there m8,

add the close bracket ")" at the end of the address

grayme-m

mdbarber wrote: »

nowt there m8,

Try again

dmg24

mute_posting wrote: »

Not if they state "without prejudice" - AFAIK it is quite a common legal term used in lots of such preliminary negotiations.

Perhaps if you stop slagging off dmg24 and ask nicely, she will explain it.

MP

EDIT

this may help if you have already burnt all bridges with dmg...

http://www.geoffreyleaver.com/resources/resource.asp?DeptID=2&SubDeptID=126&toolkitid=130

unfortunately, you maye have scuppered your chances though

Sadly I have no expertise in 'The Law According to mdbarber', so our knowledge is possibly best kept for those who live in the real world.

mdbarber

dmg24 wrote: »

Sadly I have no expertise in 'The Law According to mdbarber', so our knowledge is possibly best kept for those who live in the real world.

and i still feel that way,
The term wo prejudice is a mere cop-out and even if successfully entered with a judge it only means i cannot use it as "evidence" to support my case, nothing else
it certainly does not apply in cases where possible criminal charges may be brought

mdbarber

As a side note i have agreed that the management of two threads is getting confusing for all concerned, please use this thread to comment on the concept of threads being used against consumers etc and the OP for comment about my case specifically
regards
mdbarber