DVLA clamped my car- Can i appeal ?

vaio

ben500 wrote: »

My post made no mention of repudiation of the claim, perhaps you'd like to read the post again.

Your post said……..

ben500 wrote: »

If you check your own insurance policy you will see that it requires the vehicle to be taxed if on the public highway or the policy can be declared void this also applies to MOT certification. Incidentally if even if your vehicle is taxed/untaxed but not carrying a current valid MOT certificate your insurance company can if they deem appropriate settle for it's scrap value in the event it is stolen or damaged.

What are you saying?

They void your insurance due to lack of tax/MOT and then pay claims?

ben500

vaio wrote: »

Your post said……..



What are you saying?

They void your insurance due to lack of tax/MOT and then pay claims?

Nope. That may be what your seeing but it certainly isn't what I am saying.

vaio

ben500 wrote: »

Nope. That may be what your seeing but it certainly isn't what I am saying.

Ah, when you said:

“…….If you check your own insurance policy you will see that it requires the vehicle to be taxed if on the public highway or the policy can be declared void, this also applies to MOT certification……...”

I read it as they can void your insurance if your car isn’t taxed and/or MOT’d.

Obviously my comprehension skills are not what I thought they were.

What did you mean?

ben500

vaio wrote: »

Ah, when you said:

“…….If you check your own insurance policy you will see that it requires the vehicle to be taxed if on the public highway or the policy can be declared void, this also applies to MOT certification……...”

I read it as they can void your insurance if your car isn’t taxed and/or MOT’d.

Obviously my comprehension skills are not what I thought they were.

What did you mean?

I mean't exactly what I said.

Dustangle

ben500 wrote: »

I mean't exactly what I said.

Are you a grocer?

ben500

Dustangle wrote: »

Are you a grocer?

Do you know something I'm sat here laughing my head off at that question and don't even know why.

vaio

ben500 wrote: »

I mean't exactly what I said.

Beats me

Wonder if !!!!wit will get through the rude words filter?

Edited to add: Apparently not, that’s a shame

ben500

Yesterday, 9:03 PM #62 vaio vbmenu_register("postmenu_15022747", true);
Serious MoneySaving Fan


Join Date: Jan 2007
Post Count: 1,351
Thanked 1,043 Times in 584 Posts



Quote:
Originally Posted by ben500
If you check your own insurance policy you will see that it requires the vehicle to be taxed if on the public highway or the policy can be declared void this also applies to MOT certification. Incidentally if even if your vehicle is taxed/untaxed but not carrying a current valid MOT certificate your insurance company can if they deem appropriate settle for it's scrap value in the event it is stolen or damaged.

Shall we start a “most wrong post of the month” competition?


So we've gone from the above smartarsed remark and some five hours later you still have not read and understood the original post, although having offered several of your own skewed versions of it in order to justify your first post, and now we are back to insults and testing profanity filters.

A pity you jumped in with both feet without perhaps asking pertinent questions.

vaio

ben500 wrote: »

Yesterday, 9:03 PM #62 vaio vbmenu_register("postmenu_15022747", true);
Serious MoneySaving Fan


Join Date: Jan 2007
Post Count: 1,351
Thanked 1,043 Times in 584 Posts



Quote:
Originally Posted by ben500
If you check your own insurance policy you will see that it requires the vehicle to be taxed if on the public highway or the policy can be declared void this also applies to MOT certification. Incidentally if even if your vehicle is taxed/untaxed but not carrying a current valid MOT certificate your insurance company can if they deem appropriate settle for it's scrap value in the event it is stolen or damaged.

Shall we start a “most wrong post of the month” competition?


So we've gone from the above smartarsed remark and some five hours later you still have not read and understood the original post, although having offered several of your own skewed versions of it in order to justify your first post, and now we are back to insults and testing profanity filters.

A pity you jumped in with both feet without perhaps asking pertinent questions.

are you a grocer?

ben500

Sorry but Dustangle jumped the gun on you there, second time round it's neither clever nor funny.

Have you read the post and consulted with your text books yet?

I'd offer to help you out if you hadn't been so rude in the first instance.