We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Triple lock increase for April 2027 is 3.9% (probably)

12467…16

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 32,618 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 15 September at 5:18PM

    With age-related spending forecast to grow by nearly 50%, from 26% of GDP to 34.5% over the next 50 years, there needs to be a coherent plan for the growing cost of age-related health and State Pension expenditure, which are the major components of spend. Social care needs to be a part of that too.

    I have a memory of reading an article in the Sunday Telegraph about 25 years ago, saying exactly what you say above regarding the ageing population.

    Unfortunately, I suspect that the nature of politics being what it is, the table above will be interpreted as no big problem for the next 20 years, so no need to do anything until then.

    Nothing has changed…..

    Also I can not remember how many times over the last 25 years, I have heard people on the news saying hospital bed blocking is a big problem due to the problems finding the right social care for them, and something must be done. But the problem remains.

  • GunJack
    GunJack Posts: 12,009 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    Burnham to the rescue with his "we'll sort out social care" mantra maybe??

    ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......

    I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple :D
  • Baldytyke88
    Baldytyke88 Posts: 1,161 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    If people want a higher pension without paying more tax, then they are dreaming. If they believe that their pension should increase and they are willing to pay for it, then they should increase the amount that they pay into their workplace pension.

    The previous Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, pledged that pensioners whose sole income comes from the state pension will not have to pay income tax during this Parliament

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 21,744 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    It depends on who receives the additional pension increase. Marginal Propensity to Consume. An individual on the poverty line given one extra £ will spend all, or very nearly all, of that extra £. A multi-millionaire given one extra £ will spend none, or very nearly none, of that extra £.

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,744 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 September at 1:14AM

    Yey - pensioners are all going to be £488 a week year better off. Well that is the way the media present it.

    Well in real terms:

    6% of pensioners will be £88 a week better off
    80% will be £10 a week worse off
    10% will be £102 a week worse off

    The following year assuming 3% inflation and 3.5% wage increases the vast majority will be either 100 or 200 worse off again.

    I think....
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,744 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Yep - the spending will generate more imports and make the balance of payments even less sustainable and increase the future net interest outflows. The saving will lead to investment that will raise future productivity and thus the size of the future pie.

    I think....
  • Baldytyke88
    Baldytyke88 Posts: 1,161 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    Over the past 15 years the state pension has increased by 25% more than wages, which is why the state pension has caught up with the personal tax allowance!

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 2,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 15 September at 10:14PM

    In what way are you saying they are worse off ? Do you mean they are paying more tax then they were then yes I can see that but that's because they have more taxable income, if you are saying they will have less net income than previously, I don't understand that.

    EDIT: Or your comparing different pensioners to each other, where somebody is worse off with the same total income but from multiple sources compared to only the new state pension ? I now think that's how you're doing it. Would be interested in where you got your percentages from and what about the other 4% you don't list

    2nd EDIT: but I doubt 80% of pensioners have only exactly the amount equivalent to new state pension but from multiple sources, so that doesn't seem right.

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,744 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper


    Quite literally worse off, after accounting for inflation your post tax income will buy less than it did the year before despite the apparent increase. Not sure there is any other way to look at this than they you are worse off. April 26 state pension income post tax buys for example 12500 chocolate bars. Chocolate bars increase with inflation for a year, come April 27 even after the increase you can only buy 12490 chocolate bars. You are worse off.

    I think....
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.