We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How much needs to be spent for a noticeable PC upgrade & would it be worth it?

1246

Comments

  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Tbh I actually didn't mention anything. Unless I did & I've since forgotten - because I know I came in to this wondering what I'd need to spend, rather than I'd like to spend £xxx. It was others who mentioned £500-£700 really.

    But anyway, the price doesn't change just because it's a laptop. If I can achieve this with £xxx on a desktop PC but a laptop would be more than that then laptop is not an option - as I want to keep cost down, not up.

    Fair point on the sizing of the screen though.

    I wasn't concerned about battery - I assumed I'd just have to have it connected to mains for a task like that. Not sure if I'd be able to remove the battery & only have it connected to mains (therefore not degrading the battery).

    🤐🤐🤐

  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Just had a look at the Shield TV Pro…

    £189.99 now on Amazon

    I bought mine in July 2022 at £152.99 which was a replacement for the one I bought in October 2021 which turned faulty which cost me £170.58.

    With the time that's passed & the way pricing has got silly on just life these days, I would've expected it to have risen more in price tbh.

    🤐🤐🤐

  • Cisco001
    Cisco001 Posts: 4,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    My recommendation of laptop will be same on this post

    But the fact is there is no reason to get laptop unless you need it portable.

    And as I said before, the min spending is £200. Then, the max is unlimited.

    You need to set a budget.

  • missile
    missile Posts: 11,942 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    OP: What performance improvement are you looking for? With your usage I would suggest your current machine should be good enough.

    To address your car analogy: I upgraded to an RS3 which does 0-60 in 4.0seconds, more than fast enough for me. I recently upgraded to20GB RAM on my HP Envy Desktop-689LVMH, more than fast enough for me. It does all I want and I don't like the bells and whistles with Windows 11.

    "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
    Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:
  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    I notice lag with browsing these days. And startup too (yes I have an SSD).

    The startup is quite quick but to go from desktop to be able to browse smoothly seems to take a little bit.

    If I want to run Handbrake on any movie it'll be 8hrs easy. I don't want to hang too much on Handbrake because once it's done then it's done, I'll have no more files to run through it so it's not like an ongoing job. Plus I could set it up at night for it to run it while I'm in bed. I've no idea how much electricity it'd use on an 8hr job but it wont be as much as a new machine I'd bet.

    And then the video editing, again that's occasional. Not daily or even weekly.

    So you could well be correct in that my PC may be enough if I was to work with the limitations (e.g. run Handbrake through the night & accept it's 1 movie per day kind of thing rather than a few movies in a day).

    🤐🤐🤐

  • booneruk
    booneruk Posts: 940 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 July at 8:08PM

    If I want to run Handbrake on any movie it'll be 8hrs easy. I don't want to hang too much on Handbrake because once it's done then it's done, I'll have no more files to run through it so it's not like an ongoing job. Plus I could set it up at night for it to run it while I'm in bed. I've no idea how much electricity it'd use on an 8hr job but it wont be as much as a new machine I'd bet.

    I think you'd be surprised! if you buy the right CPU then it would be a whole load more efficient and hugely faster to boot. I asked my favourite AI (Claude) to compare your Phenom vs a a modern Ryzen 9700x in terms of handbrake performance and efficiency:

    So you've got a chip doing ~15-25x the work, in similar or less time, while pulling similar or less power. Joules-per-frame-encoded, the 9700X is very plausibly 20x+ more efficient

    (which is around the kind of difference I would have expected - being a PC hardware enthusiast for 30+ years)

  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 33,183 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Are you copying from BlueRay to the computer? Or are these download files? You can do tweaks to improving browsing
    latency but once you get past a certain level it's all down to the website itself and all the clutter it loads in the background.

    Even if a website does not appear to show adverts it maybe tracking you in the background and linking to dozens of webpages
    that you do not see. Even this forum links to googletagmanager.com and typekit.net.

    Load something like Facebook and the list of junk in the background can be longer than your screen can show without scrolling
    and it may not fully show the page until most of that has loaded or sent it's tracking data etc. Faster, CPU and more RAM may
    do little for that once you pass a certain level of performance.

    What FPS are you getting in Handbrake? Just done a test on an 8.4GB MKV used Handbrake to encode as an MP4 and
    from the Synology to the PC it averaged 211FPS, copying that file to the same NVME on the PC increased that to 237FPS
    and I even tried converting from the main NVME to the 2nd NVME and it was still 237FPS (average not peak).

    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    I appreciate it.

    Though while you/it says 20x more efficient, what does that mean in measurable numbers?

    So instead of being in a smooth state in 5 minutes I'll be in a smooth state in 4 mins?

    Instead of running a movie in Handbrake taking 8hrs it'll take 6.5hrs?

    I don't know what my PC costs to run so no idea of any comparison there.

    In a 6.5hr scenario I'd still need to let it run through the night. Where that could change is more if it brought 8 hours down to 1 or 2 hours.

    the files for handbrake are bluray rips. They've already been done using makemkv & are sitting on a hard drive right now.

    I no longer do this as I have other means of obtaining movies. <nomoresaidthere>

    Regards FPS, it's been a long while since I actually used Handbrake…simply because of the time it takes. I don't know.

    Although I never encoded in to .mp4, always .mkv.

    🤐🤐🤐

  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper

    20x is 2000%, not 20%.

    Eight hours becomes twenty four minutes.

  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    🤐🤐🤐

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.