We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How much needs to be spent for a noticeable PC upgrade & would it be worth it?

2456

Comments

  • Paradigm
    Paradigm Posts: 3,669 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Look for something like this…. on ebay for £250 buy it now

    • AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT Processor (Brand New & Factory Sealed)
    • ASUS Prime X570-P Motherboard
    • Latest BIOS Installed
    • 16GB (2 × 8GB) Patriot Viper DDR4 RAM
    • 3600MHz Memory Speed
    • Dual-Channel Memory Kit

    Always try to be at least half the person your dog thinks you are!
  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper

    Cisco has already given you an option for around £200.Obviously, your very old CPU is the bottle neck in your system. Handbrake uses that by default, unless you turn on Hardware accelerated video encoding via the NVENC encoder, utilising the new graphics card. But even then, all the other processes, including decoding and audio etc are still going to be handled by the CPU.

    So your answer is simply to upgrade the CPU. You can do that in the way Cisco has suggested or you can find a used device somewhere.

    With their suggestion, expect Handbrake performance at least three times, up to five times, faster than now. Of course also much faster for all of your other intended tasks.

  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 July at 7:15AM

    No, £200 as illustrated by Cisco, will make a huge difference. Your CPU is lacking.

    Using your analogy, expect 0 - 60 in anything from 1.6 to 2.6 seconds.

  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper

    Any reason why you didn't post with a link?

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/168542606306

  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 July at 7:38AM

    A technical comparison between your current CPU and the £250 bundle suggested above:

    • H.264 / AVC Encoding: A 1080p video encode that struggles at roughly 15–20 FPS on the aging Phenom II 1055T will easily fly past 100–140 FPS on the Ryzen 5 5600XT.

    • H.265 / HEVC Encoding: The Phenom II will choke severely on H.265 due to the complete lack of AVX/AVX2 instruction sets, forcing it to fall back on slower legacy code paths. The Ryzen 5 5600XT will handle it efficiently, making H.265 encoding actually practical.

    For Cisco's suggestion of the Ryzen 5 5500:

    • H.264 (1080p) Encoding: Where the Phenom II 1055T chugs along at 15–20 FPS, the Ryzen 5 5500 will effortlessly push 90–110 FPS on identical 1080p presets.

    • H.265 / HEVC Encoding: The Phenom II lacks the hardware instructions required to encode HEVC efficiently, making it painfully slow. The Ryzen 5 5500 handles H.265 natively and smoothly, turning hours of rendering into minutes.
  • Boohoo
    Boohoo Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
  • Neil_Jones
    Neil_Jones Posts: 9,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    The 5600XT does not have graphics on board.
    Neither did the listed Phenom.

    The clue will be in the model number of the processor - - the general rule of thumb for AMDs if it has a G (or GE) it will have graphics otherwise it can be taken that it won't.

  • Paradigm
    Paradigm Posts: 3,669 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    No reason really, was just an example of what's available.

    Always try to be at least half the person your dog thinks you are!
  • B0bbyEwing
    B0bbyEwing Posts: 2,484 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Wow didn't know it could speed things up that much.

    Is it correct that a fast encode with handbrake results in poorer quality?

    By that I mean the exact same settings on my slow machine as they would be on a better machine. I'm not talking about slow settings on my machine vs different fast settings on a quicker machine.

    I'm going to guess that the output should be the exact same, just quicker. But I read a while ago that the output would be poorer, hence me asking.

    🤐🤐🤐

  • SammyBoyd
    SammyBoyd Posts: 42 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 July at 12:49PM

    Misread your question. You are correct. The quality will be the same. Just the process will be quicker.

    What you read likely referred to the choice of a Fast Encode setting via HandBrake, as opposed to a device that is capable of encoding more efficiently.

    You will have also the option of H.265 encoding with the device upgrade. I guess you can think about what is best for you.

    Here you can see some comparative figures with reference to encoding times: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-5600/13.html

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.