Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Top Regular Savers Discussion Thread
Comments
-
Just scroll past posts you're not interested in. Takes a nanosecond (if you are a regular reader of this thread) to identify posts which have no relevance to your situation. I've had to endure pages and pages of posts about Saffron BS which I am not in the least interested in. Did I complain? No. We all have examples like that of institutions/accounts etc etc which we have no interest in. We just have to thole it, Not a great hardship.
Edited to add: I am interested in the Beverley discussion as I am lucky enough to hold both Issues 1 and 2 of their RS.
is the heat making folks crabby? Lovely and cool up here in Caledonia today. Long may it last (but I doubt it).
19 -
For this very reason, I previously suggested that regular savers should have their own sub-forum, like ISAs do. Then account-specific threads can be easy to find. I reckon there would be more activity than on the ISA board too.
This thread feels a bit congested, but that's just my opinion, others may disagree.
14 -
I try to put the name of the provider in bold at the top of each post so that it's easier for people to ignore and scroll past if it's an account they're not interested in.
21 -
Fair enough, but can we please make an effort to stick the institution's name at the top of eack post?
Makes that scrolling past 'not interested' stuff much easier, especially when the subject of the post may well be contained in a quote which has been "enhanced" by the new system to be unreadable.
24 -
Thank you chris_the_bee! Clarity at last.
2 -
SEPARATE THREADS FOR EACH RS?
It definitely helps us all if every post, question or response has a heading/title to identify what it is about.
Of course, I accept that it should only be about RSs.
Personally, I don't think that each RS should have its own thread. I accept the way this thread is, even if many of the posts are not of interest or directly relevant to me. I am not forced to read them all.
I would not like a separate thread for each RS. For me, that would waste far more time clicking from one thread to another, because there are so many different RSs.
For me, the interest in this multiple RS thread is that it is set up to identify and discuss multiple RSs, many of which I don't have, and a few I might consider. But the useful factor about this multiple RS thread for me is that the posts and the data of the first pages also highlight the limits, benefits, quirks, inconsistencies and lack of clarity in some/many RSs. This is potentially useful information either immediately or for future RS issues. It also points us all to some RSs almost immediately after they are issued, so it gives us the opportunity to read the relevant T&Cs and consider applying immediately if we are able, eligible, ready and interested. The fact that I am not always able, eligible, ready or interested is down to me, not the fault of this thread.
15 -
Apart from putting a heading so we know what/who your post is about, I vote for leave the thread as it is.
We also have a no chat thread which people can use for information only.
13 -
I would not like a separate thread for each RS. For me, that would waste far more time clicking from one thread to another, because there are so many different RSs.
I agree. Another reason for avoiding separate threads is inevitably some people won't notice the separate thread and post about the account on this main thread - leading to duplication, confusion, and the also inevitable squabbles about what should be posted where.
I vote for keeping it simple. Bridlington1 has gone to a lot of effort to set up and maintain a sensible system where the bare facts can be found in one thread, whilst discussion about almost everything else RS related can be had here.
Folk who have difficulty scrolling past information which doesn't interest them do have other options.
17 -
While the specifics of the Beverley T&Cs have been getting a bit tedious, it leads on to general RS-based discussion, fixed vs variable, easy access vs limited withdrawals, and the benefit of open-ended accounts.
2 -
The benefit of open-ended accounts is somewhat dependent on interest rate environment. Not so long ago there was speculation we were entering a raising cycle, and with recent events that could be back on the table. It's very hard to know what a good rate will look like in a year or more's time. But I suppose you have the option to open speculatively and meet the minimum funding.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
