We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
UC/ID Verify
Comments
-
Maybe the ESA credits is affecting it because it's not currently on the migration to move across list. I would wait but get some official help. Also as suggested.
I have seen one very similar the lack of ID for young people is common really no digital footprint when they're starting out.0 -
Disabled Student criteria would relate to advanced Education - Is your 16 y/o in advanced Education?
Otherwise, I’m struggling to see how an U/18 with parental support in full time, non-advanced Education would be anything other than a Qualifying Young Person on their parent / guardian’s benefit claim.
0 -
A credits only NsESA claim would not prevent a claim for UC. Lack of ID should not prevent the claim either because they can do a biographical appointment where they would ask specific questions related to the claimant.TimeLord1 said:Maybe the ESA credits is affecting it because it's not currently on the migration to move across list. I would wait but get some official help. Also as suggested.
I have seen one very similar the lack of ID for young people is common really no digital footprint when they're starting out.
I believe they’ve left full time education. For this reason I don’t see why they shouldn’t be entitled to UC.8dayweek said:Disabled Student criteria would relate to advanced Education - Is your 16 y/o in advanced Education?
Otherwise, I’m struggling to see how an U/18 with parental support in full time, non-advanced Education would be anything other than a Qualifying Young Person on their parent / guardian’s benefit claim.0 -
A 16yo should still be in some kind of education or training until the age of 18. (I've not managed to get my head around how that interacts with UC though.)poppy12345 said:
I believe they’ve left full time education. For this reason I don’t see why they shouldn’t be entitled to UC.8dayweek said:Disabled Student criteria would relate to advanced Education - Is your 16 y/o in advanced Education?
Otherwise, I’m struggling to see how an U/18 with parental support in full time, non-advanced Education would be anything other than a Qualifying Young Person on their parent / guardian’s benefit claim.0 -
For someone to close it, that would surely be a case manager? I'm also thinking the PIP claim, if it hasn't been open long, could be affecting the information. But overall, without speaking and explaining the reasons, he should get a reconsideration.0
-
Suggest submitting new claim straight away and once submitted send journal message saying that an error has occurred, as the last claim period should not have been closed as your Son does meet eligibility criteria to claim UC.
Claiming if you’re 16 or 17
You can make a claim for Universal Credit if any of the following apply:
- you have a health condition or disability and have medical evidence for it, such as a fit note
- you’re caring for someone who gets a health or disability-related benefit
- a medical professional has said you’re nearing the end of life
- you’re responsible for a child
- you live with your partner, have responsibility for a child and your partner is eligible for Universal Credit
- you’re pregnant and expecting your baby in the next 11 weeks
- you’ve had a baby in the last 15 weeks
- you do not have parental support, for example you do not live with your parents and are not under local authority care
And submit a mandatory reconsideration request saying that the last claim period was closed in error and that your Son is eligible to claim, as not in education or training and meets criteria regarding health.The comments I post are personal opinion. Always refer to official information sources before relying on internet forums. If you have a problem with any organisation, enter into their official complaints process at the earliest opportunity, as sometimes complaints have to be started within a certain time frame.0 -
No not in any education at all.8dayweek said:Disabled Student criteria would relate to advanced Education - Is your 16 y/o in advanced Education?
Otherwise, I’m struggling to see how an U/18 with parental support in full time, non-advanced Education would be anything other than a Qualifying Young Person on their parent / guardian’s benefit claim.0 -
Yes has left full time education. Child benefit has also been updated and made aware not in educationpoppy12345 said:
A credits only NsESA claim would not prevent a claim for UC. Lack of ID should not prevent the claim either because they can do a biographical appointment where they would ask specific questions related to the claimant.TimeLord1 said:Maybe the ESA credits is affecting it because it's not currently on the migration to move across list. I would wait but get some official help. Also as suggested.
I have seen one very similar the lack of ID for young people is common really no digital footprint when they're starting out.
I believe they’ve left full time education. For this reason I don’t see why they shouldn’t be entitled to UC.8dayweek said:Disabled Student criteria would relate to advanced Education - Is your 16 y/o in advanced Education?
Otherwise, I’m struggling to see how an U/18 with parental support in full time, non-advanced Education would be anything other than a Qualifying Young Person on their parent / guardian’s benefit claim.0 -
Was awarded PIP 2 months ago. I put in the journal that he is in receipt of PIP and the rates he gets it at.TimeLord1 said:For someone to close it, that would surely be a case manager? I'm also thinking the PIP claim, if it hasn't been open long, could be affecting the information. But overall, without speaking and explaining the reasons, he should get a reconsideration.0 -
I really don't understand why UC decided to close the claim saying not eligible because he is eligible. He has established the ESA credits and is in the support group which supports he has health condition/disability. As I can still login to UC i have gone to the journal it mentions someone's name at 1.30pm with a enty ID verification appointment arranged for 3pm and then another entry by the same person at 1.30 we will phone you to verify your appointeeship at 3.20. And then the same person has cancelled the claim at 1.38pm.huckster said:Suggest submitting new claim straight away and once submitted send journal message saying that an error has occurred, as the last claim period should not have been closed as your Son does meet eligibility criteria to claim UC.Claiming if you’re 16 or 17
You can make a claim for Universal Credit if any of the following apply:
- you have a health condition or disability and have medical evidence for it, such as a fit note
- you’re caring for someone who gets a health or disability-related benefit
- a medical professional has said you’re nearing the end of life
- you’re responsible for a child
- you live with your partner, have responsibility for a child and your partner is eligible for Universal Credit
- you’re pregnant and expecting your baby in the next 11 weeks
- you’ve had a baby in the last 15 weeks
- you do not have parental support, for example you do not live with your parents and are not under local authority care
And submit a mandatory reconsideration request saying that the last claim period was closed in error and that your Son is eligible to claim, as not in education or training and meets criteria regarding health.
The journal only mentions claim closed as not eligible. But i need to find out what the reason is to cancel the claim. UC phone line will not speak to me at all as I am not down as verified appointee. Even though I explained that I am authorised by DWP as a appointee and have the paperwork.
If I was to put in a mandatory reconsideration will I not have the same problem. They would want to speak to my Son due to appointeeship not verified ? To get update on reconsideration I will have to phone the UC line again they will not speak to me
How long will the mandatory reconsideration take to resolve?
I have seen that a complaint can be put in against UC Online but this service does not have the option to upload documents.
I have searched online and my local MP does not take caseloads which is pathetic.
Me as the appointee and my son should really not be going through this its a complete nightmare. What if I start new claim explain everything in detail in the journal and then take all documents to job centre and plea to them to listen to me and don't close claim?
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
