We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

HMRC will stop cash-like investments in S&S ISAs

15678911»

Comments

  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,300 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    boingy said:
    Surely they have to allow a couple of weeks of grace for cash. Simply selling a fund and buying another within an S&S ISA can take a few days. It would be harsh to tax that money, even though it would be a fairly small amount.
    That money wouldn't in itself be taxed, would it?   Just any resultant interest it earns.


    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)
  • babellon
    babellon Posts: 1 Newbie
    Second Anniversary First Post

    Are there senior ISA's in existence and if so which would people recommend?

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 41,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    No, I was just speculating that they might be created as a way of implementing the differentiation between rules for over- and under-65s, but it's still very early days (nothing changes until April 2027) and details haven't been announced.

  • Taffy22
    Taffy22 Posts: 1 Newbie
    Name Dropper First Post

    I have most of my investments in S&S ISA`s, mainly in dividend paying shares and ETF`s. Being over 65, I allow the dividends to accumulate as uninvested cash until sufficient to justify transferring the cash to a cash ISA reducing risk.
    As I understand it, the proposed changes to S&S uninvested cash compromising of dividends will be taxed and cannot be transferred out.
    I suspect my only option before April 2027 is to sell most of my shares, transfer the resulting cash to cash ISAs  and after April 2027, sell shares and withdraw the proceeds out of the ISA as I need the money.
    This seems to be counterproductive to the intended rules of promoting more investment in S&S ISA`s. Or, am I missing something?

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,385 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Or, am I missing something?

    As the final rules have yet to be published and there are lots of issues that need to be resolved, it is probably best just to keep an eye on what happens as there will be time to adjust once they are known.

    In particular, what happens to 65+ investors and the options they have available to them.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 41,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    As above, nothing has been decided yet, but it's clear from the government's tax newsletter (linked at the start of the thread) that the proposed changes apply to under-65s, with the clear implication being that they don't apply to over-65s! Obviously anything can happen during design of the detail, but I haven't seen anything credible that would suggest over-65s being impaired in their ISA choices in the way you're suggesting.

  • boingy
    boingy Posts: 2,018 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    Yeah, an opt out would be sensible. Now, do we think the rules will be sensible?

  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,279 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Some providers (like iWeb/SWSD) have never paid interest on cash balances. When rates were 0.5% it was understandable but it's probably one way they fund the otherwise free (for holding) platform cost. Gives an incentive to keep cash invested.

    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.