We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HMRC will stop cash-like investments in S&S ISAs
Comments
-
If it was, that would also apply to a LISA. It is not a protected characteristic in the Equalities Act. The same as you get enhanced redundancy terms over the age of 41.tigerspill said:Would this come under age discrimination I wonder?0 -
For many schemes, it's still the "normal retirement age" at which pension payments start, and lump sums may be taken.Cobbler_tone said:I haven't seen or read why they have plucked an arbitrary age of 65 out of the air. The state pension age from 2010? Free bus pass for most of the nation?
I appreciate not everything needs to be tied together but a strange number to pick.0 -
Well I guess so, but if I invest let's say regularly into XYZ fund which may stop being eligible I would need to change that.Aretnap said:
There will be no extra complication from the end user's perspective. You are not going to be personally responsible for deciding which investments are ISA eligible and which aren't - that's for HMRC and the ISA providers to argue about. From your point of view the menu of investments that appears when you click "buy" will just be slightly shorter.Newbie_John said:Many people already avoid S&S as they may seem very complicated so adding another level of complication will only push people away even more.. they should've taxed Premium Bonds and leave ISA as they were.
Also I like keeping my portfolio simple 3 funds, so what will happen, some of them will be locked? Will I have to sell and buy something else?
Keep pre 2027 funds and post 2027?
Also let's say in worst case scenario they will only allow 100% equity funds.. that would definitely put people off.
If they put threshold on something like 30% min. equities, then people will just use wrappers like Vanguard Life Strategy 30 etc. meaning 70% still ends up in "income" subfunds.
Interesting to see how things develop but just saying that it won't be encouraging , it's more to get more money to HMRC.0 -
They are banning S&S ISA to cash ISA transfers too.
However nothing to stop such transfers now in the way of anti-forestalling rules, so time before April 2027 to initiate such a transfer if desired.1 -
So if I receive dividends in my S&S ISAs (currently about 50 payments per year worth maybe £40K) I'm going to have to reinvest them immediately to avoid being penalised? This is utterly ludicrous and unworkable.
I always thought the idea of trying to 'persuade' savers to invest in S&S ISAs, as opposed to cash ISAs, by reducing the contribution limit to the latter was likely to have little effect. Adding idiotic and confused restrictions to S&S ISAs will only actively discourage potential new investors. Just how much thought was put into these proposals?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
