We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Claim Form Received from UK Car Management Limited
Options
Comments
-
When referring to case law and including exhibits, am I permitted to provide links to the full judgments, or must I include the entire judgment text as part of my WS bundle because if I do I will soon go over 50 pages.
Additionally, could someone kindly direct me to the full case law referenced?
Thank you in advance
0 -
is this still too long for the conclusion:
The Particulars of claim falls short of the requirements under CPR 16.4 and Practice Direction 16.
The claimant has failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA) by not providing a valid Notice to Keeper (NtK).
The claimant acknowledges in their Witness Statement that a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) was not issued on the alleged date of contravention, undermining the basis of the claim.
The Claimant’s Witness Statement, signed by Deanne Never's of Gladstones Solicitors, does not comply with CPR 32.4 and PD32.
The Claimant is put to strict proof of their legal standing to bring the claim, including evidence of a valid and current agreement with the landowner.
In light of these substantial deficiencies including non-compliance with POFA, lack of a valid contract, lack of landowner authority, and procedural inconsistencies I respectfully request that the Court strike out this claim in its entirety.0 -
I doubt UKCPM didn't comply with POFA?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
I got that from another WS should I take that bit out?
0 -
None of it seems relevant to your case.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
I'm a bit confused. Previously, I was advised to shorten the conclusion, which I have now done. However, I'm now being told that it doesn't seem relevant to my case. Does this mean the conclusion is entirely incorrect, or are there just parts of it that need to be amended? I will remove the POFA reference from both the conclusion and the Witness Statement.
0 -
The conclusion (of anything, not just a witness statement) should be a summation of points already raised in the main document along with the forceful point(s) you want to make in two or three words or bullet point. It should be used to point the judge to the most important factors and why it/they are important.3
-
Get the WS to match your case ( dont just blindly copy stuff, double check that it's relevant )
The concise conclusion will then sum up the case, ideally pointing out the magic bullets for dismissal
But a conclusion should not be based on fictional or irrelevant points, especially if they are not true
If their case was that you went into Asda in Newcastle UK and robbed the safe on 1st July 2024, your defence plea is not guilty, it wasn't me, your Witness statement says that you flew to Japan on 28th June 2024 ( with proof of airline ticket ) and were staying in the Hilton in Tokyo ( with proof of Hotel booking ) until you flew back on 12th July 2024
Conclusion, they accused the wrong person, your honour ! The case should be dismissed and the defendant acquitted !3 -
mebobby said:When referring to case law and including exhibits, am I permitted to provide links to the full judgments, or must I include the entire judgment text as part of my WS bundle because if I do I will soon go over 50 pages.
Additionally, could someone kindly direct me to the full case law referenced?
Thank you in advance2 -
Apart from the POFA bit which I was unsure about the rest of the stuff above in the conclusion is relevant. The Claimant has merely provided an Audit form which does not prove that they have a legal standing to bring the claim. It is also signed by someone who is not directly involved and the poc of claim are vague and merely state that there is a breach of the signs and does not specify the actual breach.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards