We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Returning item but told it needs to be sent back to manufacturer in China
Comments
-
Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
The OP said it cost £60, so the chargeback route seems best. As the goods are not what was ordered, I would argue with the bank that it's the seller's obligation to pick them up, or at least arrange for delivery.
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
GDB2222 said:Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.1 -
GDB2222 said:Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
The OP said it cost £60, so the chargeback route seems best. As the goods are not what was ordered, I would argue with the bank that it's the seller's obligation to pick them up, or at least arrange for delivery.
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.
Which these do not appear to be. As it seems they are made in China.
Best guess is this site is either reseller, or they are yet another Chinese co selling under the guise of UK co.
TBH, it should be clear exactly where the goods were delivered from by the address label to OP address.Life in the slow lane0 -
Bit of an update:
Seller has confirmed it is a UK company, albeit a sole trader not Ltd.Is the consensus that I should be able to return this to a UK address? Given that returning to China is not reasonable?0 -
Datamunky said:Bit of an update:
Seller has confirmed it is a UK company, albeit a sole trader not Ltd.Is the consensus that I should be able to return this to a UK address? Given that returning to China is not reasonable?
The company is almost definitely Chinese. They seller is using the brand of the previous site to sell their goods.
Check the label that was delivered to you.0 -
Datamunky said:Bit of an update:
Seller has confirmed it is a UK company, albeit a sole trader not Ltd.Is the consensus that I should be able to return this to a UK address? Given that returning to China is not reasonable?
If they are a drop shipper, then the order might/will be in your name from the supplier, not from this company.
As above what does the paperwork you received with package say?Life in the slow lane0 -
born_again said:GDB2222 said:Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
The OP said it cost £60, so the chargeback route seems best. As the goods are not what was ordered, I would argue with the bank that it's the seller's obligation to pick them up, or at least arrange for delivery.
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.
Para 35(3) of the CCRs says:The address to which goods must be sent under paragraph (2)(a) is—
(a) any address specified by the trader for sending the goods back;
(b) if no address is specified for that purpose, any address specified by the trader for the consumer to contact the trader;
(c) if no address is specified for either of those purposes, any place of business of the trader [My bold for emphasis]
Because para 35 is covered by para (l) of Schedule 2, then under para 13 of the regulations the return address is information that the consumer must be given before entering into a distance contract.
If the trader does not give a specified return address before the contract is entered into, surely the consumer is legally entitled under the regulations to return the goods to any contact address or any place of business of the trader under (b) and (c) above?
I appreciate you'll probably say that "chargeback isn't a legal right etc", but it would seem perverse to me that a return to an address that would (or might?) count as a return under the regulations would not count as a return under chargeback...
[I think @ThumbRemote was putting forward a similar argument based on the trader not providing a return address before the contract was entered into(?)]
1 -
eskbanker said:GDB2222 said:Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.I don’t think that spending £20+ on returning the goods to China makes sense. There’s nobody here in the UK to sue, and even if there were could the OP be sure of collecting on the judgment? Can you see a better option than trying to get the bank to return the money?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Okell said:born_again said:GDB2222 said:Okell said:Datamunky said:Is there any recourse if they’re not a UK company because the item is counterfeit/clone/not genuine?
If yes to both you can make a s75* claim against your card provider under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 on the basis that the item is "not as described".
If you used a credit card but paid via PayPal or Klarna etc you may not have a claim.
If you paid by debit card you might be able to ask your bank for a chargeback, but they might want you to return the item first.
So how did you pay?
*s75 Consumer Credit Act 1974
The OP said it cost £60, so the chargeback route seems best. As the goods are not what was ordered, I would argue with the bank that it's the seller's obligation to pick them up, or at least arrange for delivery.
In any case, apart from chargeback, there's no sensible route for the OP to follow.
Para 35(3) of the CCRs says:The address to which goods must be sent under paragraph (2)(a) is—
(a) any address specified by the trader for sending the goods back;
(b) if no address is specified for that purpose, any address specified by the trader for the consumer to contact the trader;
(c) if no address is specified for either of those purposes, any place of business of the trader [My bold for emphasis]
Because para 35 is covered by para (l) of Schedule 2, then under para 13 of the regulations the return address is information that the consumer must be given before entering into a distance contract.
If the trader does not give a specified return address before the contract is entered into, surely the consumer is legally entitled under the regulations to return the goods to any contact address or any place of business of the trader under (b) and (c) above?
I appreciate you'll probably say that "chargeback isn't a legal right etc", but it would seem perverse to me that a return to an address that would (or might?) count as a return under the regulations would not count as a return under chargeback...
[I think @ThumbRemote was putting forward a similar argument based on the trader not providing a return address before the contract was entered into(?)]
All they say is that goods have to be returned as per retailer instructions. Only way to avoid that is if retailer is totally unresponsive in providing a address.
Which it appears is not the case here.
Or the goods are counterfeit. Which is not the case here.Life in the slow lane1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards