📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

UC and if you go over 16k?

1101112131416»

Comments

  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,158 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    It makes no sense to me at all

    Given this, I would require evidence supporting the earnings and benefits used within the assessment period, to disregard them.

    if earnings and/ or  benefits are used, then how can they be disregarded?  It's impossible to disregard something that you no longer have. 


    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • blackstar
    blackstar Posts: 645 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It makes no sense to me at all

    Given this, I would require evidence supporting the earnings and benefits used within the assessment period, to disregard them.

    if earnings and/ or  benefits are used, then how can they be disregarded?  It's impossible to disregard something that you no longer have. 


    It makes no sense at all? Only thing that might make sense is he is trying to see if I haven't immediately withdrawn the earnings/ benefits and sent off somewhere, rather than having used them for living expenses? Maybe hes wanting to confirm it's not deprivation of capital? 
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,158 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    blackstar said:
    It makes no sense to me at all

    Given this, I would require evidence supporting the earnings and benefits used within the assessment period, to disregard them.

    if earnings and/ or  benefits are used, then how can they be disregarded?  It's impossible to disregard something that you no longer have. 


    It makes no sense at all? Only thing that might make sense is he is trying to see if I haven't immediately withdrawn the earnings/ benefits and sent off somewhere, rather than having used them for living expenses? Maybe hes wanting to confirm it's not deprivation of capital? 
    The more I reread it the more I haven't the foggiest idea what they are trying to say.
    With the DLA they are claiming it's income & capital in the same AP,  as NedS has pointed out it can't be both in same AP

    Maybe someone else can decipher it, I can't even offer advice on a reply as I don't think it would be helpful.
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • huckster
    huckster Posts: 5,307 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They are simply saying that if you receive £4k in benefits per month, you need to provide evidence that you spent all of the £4k. That you are not saving any of the benefit amount.

    Because you appear to have one account, they are getting you to prove this.


    The comments I post are personal opinion. Always refer to official information sources before relying on internet forums. If you have a problem with any organisation, enter into their official complaints process at the earliest opportunity, as sometimes complaints have to be started within a certain time frame.
  • blackstar
    blackstar Posts: 645 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    huckster said:
    They are simply saying that if you receive £4k in benefits per month, you need to provide evidence that you spent all of the £4k. That you are not saving any of the benefit amount.

    Because you appear to have one account, they are getting you to prove this.


    While doing the dishes I had a thought?
    You know on the UC system for "money saving and investments" declaration. Why would I declare my wage for that AP? Surley I should not as its not at that point money savings or investments right? Its not disregarded capital either. It's income received in that AP right? It doeant cone under the money saving and investments. UC already know my wage and will make deductions on my UC payment anyway, they cant do that and also count it as capital the same time when it's not yet capital, it's income right? So I should just minus it from the total from my bank balance when I make a money savings and investments declaration right? 

    Similar goes for my saved COL payments, I shouldn't include them under the money savings and investments declaration either right? 🤔
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,158 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    edited 15 August at 10:27AM
    blackstar said:
    huckster said:
    They are simply saying that if you receive £4k in benefits per month, you need to provide evidence that you spent all of the £4k. That you are not saving any of the benefit amount.

    Because you appear to have one account, they are getting you to prove this.


    While doing the dishes I had a thought?
    You know on the UC system for "money saving and investments" declaration. Why would I declare my wage for that AP? Surley I should not as its not at that point money savings or investments right? Its not disregarded capital either. It's income received in that AP right? It doeant cone under the money saving and investments. UC already know my wage and will make deductions on my UC payment anyway, they cant do that and also count it as capital the same time when it's not yet capital, it's income right? So I should just minus it from the total from my bank balance when I make a money savings and investments declaration right? 

    Similar goes for my saved COL payments, I shouldn't include them under the money savings and investments declaration either right? 🤔
     The terminology on the UC account is totally misleading. It talks about monies but it should be about capital.
    There are correct ways to calculate it, Either report all monies and  have income and disregard deducted from the total of monies.
    Or just report counted capital, that means leaving off income and disregarded  or even a hybrid of the two.
    What the DWP does is ask for all monies then treats it all as capital which is clearly wrong.

    I use method two, I would report counted capital,  but as my counted capital is under £6k I don't bother updating it. My monies are far above £6k
     

    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • Spoonie_Turtle
    Spoonie_Turtle Posts: 10,359 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    blackstar said:
    huckster said:
    They are simply saying that if you receive £4k in benefits per month, you need to provide evidence that you spent all of the £4k. That you are not saving any of the benefit amount.

    Because you appear to have one account, they are getting you to prove this.


    While doing the dishes I had a thought?
    You know on the UC system for "money saving and investments" declaration. Why would I declare my wage for that AP? Surley I should not as its not at that point money savings or investments right? … It doeant cone under the money saving and investments. 
    Well if wages aren't money I don't know what they are!  Same with the CoL payments.

    That's why we're in this pickle, answering the questions they ask.  They're asking the wrong questions but I don't think there's much we can do about it.
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,158 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
     They're asking the wrong questions but I don't think there's much we can do about it.
    Not only wrong they are also incoherent.
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,621 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    huckster said:
    They are simply saying that if you receive £4k in benefits per month, you need to provide evidence that you spent all of the £4k. That you are not saving any of the benefit amount.

    Because you appear to have one account, they are getting you to prove this.


    I agree with others that DWP can't have it both ways.

    Would be better to open a new account. Transfer current funds to that & use the current one for daily living, so it is clear that funds coming in are spent for daily living. The rest is in effect savings, thus capital.

    But this really is a farce & common sense is not in play at all.
    Sometimes you just have to play the game by playing  the rules 😶‍🌫️

    Really think this is going to end up at a tribunal to get a ruling on.
    Life in the slow lane
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.